首页> 外文会议>Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Proceedings >Sensitivity and Specificity of 3-D texture analysis of lung parenchyma is better than 2-D for discrimination of lung pathology in Stage 0 COPD
【24h】

Sensitivity and Specificity of 3-D texture analysis of lung parenchyma is better than 2-D for discrimination of lung pathology in Stage 0 COPD

机译:肺实质3-D纹理分析的敏感性和特异性优于2-D,用于阶段0 COPD中的肺病理学辨别

获取原文

摘要

Lung parenchyma evaluation via multidetector-row CT (MDCT), has significantly altered clinical practice in the early detection of lung disease. Our goal is to enhance our texture-based tissue classification ability to differentiate early pathologic processes by extending our 2-D Adaptive Multiple Feature Method (AMFM) to 3-D AMFM. We performed MDCT on 34 human volunteers in five categories: emphysema in severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) as EC, emphysema in mild COPD (MC), normal appearing lung in COPD (NC), non-smokers with normal lung function (NN), smokers with normal function (NS). We volumetrically excluded the airway and vessel regions, calculated 24 volumetric texture features for each Volume of Interest (VOI); and used Bayesian rules for discrimination. Leave-one-out and half-half methods were used for testing. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated. The accuracy of the leave-one-out method for the four-class classification in the form of 3-D/2-D is: EC: 84.9%/70.7%, MC: 89.8%/82.7%; NC: 87.5.0%/49.6%; NN: 100.0%/60.0%. The accuracy of the leave-one-out method for the two-class classification in the form of 3-D/2-D is: NN: 99.3%/71.6%; NS: 99.7%/74.5%. We conclude that 3-D AMFM analysis of the lung parenchyma improves discrimination compared to 2-D analysis of the same images.
机译:通过多替代行CT(MDCT)的肺实质评估,在早期检测肺病中显着改变了临床实践。我们的目标是通过将我们的二维自适应多特征方法(AMFM)扩展为3-D AMFM来增强基于纹理的组织分类能力以区分早期病理过程。我们在34个人类志愿者上进行了MDCT,其中五类:肺气肿是严重的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)作为EC,肺气肿在轻度COPD(MC)中,正常出现在COPD(NC),非吸烟者具有正常肺功能(NN) ),具有正常功能的吸烟者(NS)。我们在呼吸道和船舶区域中排斥,计算每种兴趣体积(VOI)的24个容量纹理特征;并利用贝叶斯规则进行歧视。休留一次和半半方法用于测试。计算灵敏度,特异性和准确性。以3-D / 2-D形式为四类分类的休假方法的准确性为:EC:84.9%/ 70.7%,MC:89.8%/ 82.7%; NC:87.5.0%/ 49.6%; NN:100.0%/ 60.0%。以3-D / 2-D形式为两类分类的休养方法的准确性为:NN:99.3%/ 71.6%; NS:99.7%/ 74.5%。我们得出结论,与同一图像的2-D分析相比,肺检询的3-D AMFM分析提高了识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号