首页> 外文会议>Society of Petroleum Engineers Production and Operations Symposium >Applying Science and Best Practices to Increase Production and Optimize Economics in a West Texas Gas Field-A Canyon Sand Case Study
【24h】

Applying Science and Best Practices to Increase Production and Optimize Economics in a West Texas Gas Field-A Canyon Sand Case Study

机译:应用科学和最佳实践来增加西德克萨斯州天然气场的生产和优化经济学 - 峡谷沙案研究

获取原文

摘要

Hydraulic fracturing is the most popular and successful stimulation treatment in the petroleum industry. Fracturing technology has opened numerous unconventional hydrocarbon frontiers that, were it not for this process, would otherwise be uneconomic to develop. However, designing the optimal hydraulic fracture is anything but an exact science. Our industry relies on many simplifying assumptions that assist in making expedient decisions, but can prevent reaching a truly optimized treatment. Additionally, the optimal hydraulic fracture treatment rests in the eye of the beholder. Given the cyclic nature of the industry, for many companies the optimization process has become synonymous with "getting the same results at lower cost." However, to successfully optimize a fracture treatment, one should also consider design modifications which increase production, evaluating the costs and benefits of each alternative. Using economic criteria appropriate for the company goals, this process can yield an economically optimized fracture design. Unfortunately, even this method typically fails to provide an industry-wide "best practices" approach. What is deemed optimal for one company may not be optimal for another, as each company may have different financial and economic goals. This paper will outline the approach that one Canyon Sand operator used to apply sound science and best practices to meet their financial goals by altering the hydraulic fracture design. Initial well productivity has been improved over 60% with these modifications. Since the design changes required an incremental investment, the authors will present several economic analyses of the outcome. It will also be shown that depending on a company's specific evaluation criteria (NPV, Cost Target, EUR, etc.), these design changes may or may not reach individual economic hurdles and be incorporated in future work. Readers of this paper will see how specific design changes increased production and understand the process required to truly optimize production using economic criteria.
机译:液压压裂是石油工业中最受欢迎和最成功的刺激治疗。压裂技术开辟了众多非传统的碳氢化合物前沿,否则是不经济的发展。然而,设计最佳的液压骨折是一种精确的科学。我们的行业依赖于许多简化的假设,有助于制定有利的决策,但可以防止达到真正优化的治疗。此外,最佳的液压骨折处理静止地静止。鉴于该行业的循环性质,对于许多公司来说,优化过程已成为“以较低的成本获得相同的结果”代名词。然而,为了成功优化骨折处理,还应考虑设计改进,增加生产,评估每种替代方案的成本和益处。利用适合公司目标的经济标准,该过程可以产生经济优化的骨折设计。不幸的是,即使这种方法通常无法提供行业范围的“最佳实践”方法。由于每个公司可能具有不同的金融和经济目标,因此一家公司认为最佳最佳最佳。本文将概述一个峡谷砂算子用于应用声音科学和最佳实践来满足其财务目标来实现其财务目标,改变液压骨折设计。这些修改,初始井生产率超过60%。由于设计变更所需的增量投资,提交人将提出几次结果的经济分析。还还将表明,根据公司的特定评估标准(NPV,成本目标,EUR等),这些设计变更可能或可能无法达到个别经济障碍,并​​在将来的工作中纳入并入。本文的读者将看到具体的设计如何变化增加生产,并了解使用经济标准真正优化生产所需的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号