首页> 外文会议>China International Conference in Finance >Law, Economic, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Scandal in a Transition Economy: Insight from China
【24h】

Law, Economic, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Scandal in a Transition Economy: Insight from China

机译:过渡经济中的法律,经济,公司治理和企业丑闻:来自中国的洞察力

获取原文

摘要

There is much higher ratio of firms with the incidence of scandal in a transition economy such as China than in developed economy. This paper empirically examines whether certain corporate governance mechanism are related to the probability of a firm is associated with corporate scandal. We examine Chinese listed firms that are enforced by Chins Security Regulation Committee (CSRC) or stock exchanges. We find that several key governance characteristics are related to the probability of a firm to commit scandal. These include the types controller of the firm, the ownership level of the largest shareholder, the stock holding of the chairman, and ratio of paid supervisors on the Supervisory Committee. Our findings suggest that the governance mechanism especially ownership does matter in avoiding serious corporate scandal in a transition economy such as China. There is no evidence that several other governance characteristics are related to the probability of a firm commit scandal, including the board size, independent directors, the institution ownership, and the size of Supervisory Committee. We also find that the level of a region’s economy development is negatively related to the probability of a firm in the region to commit scandals. As a region’s GDP per capita increase, a firm in the region will be less likely to commit fraud. In addition we find that in a region where the number of commercial cases investigated by procurator is larger, a firm in the region is more likely to commit scandal. These suggest that the procuratorate system is not effective and when legal system is not effective a firm is more likely to commit scandal if there are more firms or people commit fraud or default in commercial contracts in that “neighborhood”. We find a similar but non-linear relation between the number of commercial suits on the court in a province and the probability of a firm to commit scandal in that region. As the number of commercial suits on the court in a province increases, the probability of a firm to commit scandal rises; when the number of commercial suits on the court reach certain level, the probability of a firm to commit scandal falls. It suggests that when the court system becomes effective and more people and firms go to court to protect themselves, the firms will be constraint in committing fraud. Overall we find that in China corporate governance is essential in avoiding corporate scandal. Moreover, in a transition economy the level of economic development and legal system are also related to firm’s probability to commit fraud.
机译:在中国经济如发达经济等过渡经济中,公司的丑闻发生率远高得多。本文经验审查了某些公司治理机制是否与公司的概率有关与企业丑闻相关。我们审查了下巴安全监管委员会(CSRC)或股票交易所强制执行的中国上市公司。我们发现,有几个重点治理特征与企业承诺丑闻的可能性有关。这些包括公司的类型控制器,最大股东的所有权水平,主席的股票召开以及监事会上有偿监事的比例。我们的调查结果表明,治理机制尤其是所有权,确实在避免了中国过渡经济中的严重企业丑闻。没有证据表明,其他一些治理特征与坚定的承诺丑闻的可能性有关,包括董事会规模,独立董事,机构所有权和监事会的规模。我们还发现,该地区经济发展的水平与该地区公司在该地区的概率造成否定丑闻的概率。作为一个地区人均GDP增加,该地区的公司将不太可能犯欺诈。此外,我们发现,在采购者调查的商业案例数量较大的地区,该地区的公司更有可能提交丑闻。这些表明,如果在该“邻居”中的商业合同中,法律制度在法律制度无效时,如果有更多公司或人员在该社区合同中讨论欺诈或违约,则该公司更有可能提交丑闻。我们在省份法院的商业诉讼数量之间找到了类似但非线性的关系,以及公司在该地区承诺丑闻的可能性。随着在省内法院的商业诉讼数量的增加,公司承诺丑闻的概率升高;当法院的商业诉讼数量达到一定程度时,公司致力于宣传丑闻的可能性。它表明,当法院制度变得有效,更多的人和公司去法院保护自己时,该公司将在欺诈犯下的限制。总的来说,我们发现,在中国公司治理方面对避免公司丑闻至关重要。此外,在过渡经济中,经济发展和法律制度的水平也与公司承诺欺诈的概率有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号