【24h】

CCM VICKERS KEY COMPARISON - STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES

机译:CCM Vickers关键比较 - 艺术状态和观点

获取原文

摘要

In the framework of the Working Group on Hardness (WGH) of the Consultative Committee for Mechanical Measurements (CCM) in the year 2003 the key comparison Vickers was finished. In the comparison the hardness laboratories of 10 national metrology institutes participated: IMGC (Italy), NIST (USA), INMETRO (Brazil), NIM (P.R. China), KRISS (Republic of Korea), NMIJ (Japan), CMI (Czech Republic), GUM (Poland), NPL (U.K.), and PTB (Germany) served as the pilot laboratory. The comparison of the Vickers primary hardness standard machines was carried out with three sets of hardness reference blocks of the Vickers scales HV0,2, HV1 and HV 30 each with the hardness levels 240 HV, 540 HV and 840 HV. The Vickers key comparison for all used test forces ranges (Micro Vickers, Small Force Vickers, Macro Vickers) delivered valuable metrological data, and its main results are presented. The ways to determine the reference values are discussed. The uncertainties of the reference values can be considered as the present accuracy limits of Vickers measurements in the investigated ranges of hardness scales.
机译:在协商委员会机械测量(CCM)工作组的硬度(WGH)在2003年的框架键比较维克斯结束了。在比较的10个国家计量机构的硬度实验室参加:IMGC(意大利),NIST(美国),INMETRO(巴西),NIM(中国),KRISS(韩国),NMIJ(日本),CMI(捷克共和国),GUM(波兰),NPL(英国)和PTB(德国)担任飞行员实验室。维氏硬度主标准机器的比较用三套维氏硬度的参考块的情况下进行扩展HV0,2,HV1和HV 30各自与硬度水平240 HV,540 HV和840 HV。所有用过的试验力范围(微维氏,小部队维氏,维氏宏)维氏键比较为您提供有价值的计量数据,其主要结果。以确定所述参考值的方式进行了讨论。参考值的不确定性可以被认为是在硬度标度的调查范围维克斯测量的精度存在限度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号