首页> 外文会议>Annual conference of the Association of State Dam Safety Officials >Sediment Transport Evaluation for Dam Removal Scenarios, Fossil Springs Diversion Dam, Arizona
【24h】

Sediment Transport Evaluation for Dam Removal Scenarios, Fossil Springs Diversion Dam, Arizona

机译:大坝去除情景,化石春天坝,亚利桑那州泥沙输运评价

获取原文

摘要

Fossil Creek is a stream in north-central Arizona that is fed by Fossil Springs. Spring flow, nearly 43 cfs, is characterized by high concentrations of calcium carbonate – which leads to the formation of natural travertine dams in the creek. Flow in the creek has been altered for almost a century due to a hydropower (currently producing 4.2 MW) facility (diversion dam, flume, power plants, channels, tunnels, etc.), which was constructed in the early 1900’s. The facility manager has committed to decommissioning, beginning in early 2005, with a return of full flow to Fossil Creek. There are several major issues related to decommissioning and restoration in the watershed and stream corridor areas. Of concern to many parties is the future of the Fossil Springs diversion dam, sited approximately 1000 ft downstream of Fossil Springs. Due to nearly complete siltation of the reservoir area between the dam and Fossil Springs, the Fossil Springs riparian ecosystem has expanded over the past 90 years to encompass the sediment wedge upstream of the dam. Dam management scenarios have been identified that range from no action to complete removal. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, as part of its preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) of the license surrender application, sought to identify the hydrological, hydraulic and sedimentation impacts related to these scenarios. We considered a project reach of approximately 0.25 miles – that portion of the Fossil Creek drainage in the immediate vicinity of the Fossil Springs dam. As part of our study, we prepared hydrologic, hydraulic and sediment transport models to evaluate probable impacts of the different scenarios. Though the results are approximate, we were able to develop forecasts of system response to return of base flow and to seasonally significant flows, as well as to infrequent high-magnitude storm flows.
机译:Fossil Creek是亚利桑那州北部亚利桑那州的溪流,由化石泉喂养。弹簧流动,近43cfs,其特征在于高浓度的碳酸钙 - 这导致溪流中的自然石灰华坝的形成。由于水电(目前生产4.2兆瓦)设施(导流坝,水槽,发电厂,渠道,隧道等),克里克的流动已经改变了近一个世纪。该设施经理致力于退役,从2005年初开始,回归FOSSIL CREEK。流域和流走廊地区的退役和恢复有几个主要问题。对于许多政党的关注是化石簧转移大坝的未来,在化石弹簧下游约1000英尺。由于水坝和化石弹簧之间的储层区域近乎完全淤积,Fossil Springs河岸生态系统在过去90年里扩展了沉积物楔子的上游。已经确定了大坝管理场景,没有任何行动来完成删除的范围。作为其制定许可证投降申请的环境评估(EA)的一部分,联邦能源监管委员会或FERC,试图识别与这些情况相关的水文,液压和沉降影响。我们考虑了大约0.25英里的项目覆盖范围 - 在化石春天大坝附近的化石溪流排水。作为我们研究的一部分,我们制备了水文,液压和沉积物运输模型,以评估不同情景的可能影响。虽然结果是近似的,但我们能够开发系统响应的预测,以回报基础流量和季节性重大流动,以及不常见的高幅度风暴流动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号