首页> 外文会议>IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics >Palpation tomography - a new technique for modulus estimation in Elastography
【24h】

Palpation tomography - a new technique for modulus estimation in Elastography

机译:触摸断层扫描 - 弹性造影中模数估计的新技术

获取原文

摘要

In Elastography, strain estimation has been shown to be far more reliable compared to the elastic properties obtained using reconstruction techniques. In this study, to make the method less sensitive to noise in the experimental data and inspired by the clinical practice of palpation (i.e., the use of sequential finger loading), we investigated the effect of using several different smaller quasi-static load cases (instead of a one-time load on the whole boundary), with the error indicator taken as the sum of the errors from each load case. This increased the ratio of measurements to the fitted parameters, which made the method less sensitive to random errors. To demonstrate this effect, we calculated displacements from a two-dimensional, quadrilateral, plane-strain, finite-element model of a 40-by-40 mm region containing a cylindrical inclusion (7 mm in diameter) three-times stiffer than the background. The ratio of nodal pressures was chosen to produce approximately 0.75% strain. Known amounts of random displacement errors were then added at a signal-to-noise ratio varying from 60 dB to 20 dB. Elastic modulus reconstructions using the noisy displacement results from a single, total-boundary, pressure load (as is typically applied in elastography) were compared to reconstructions using data from nine smaller-width loading cases, and the reconstructed modulus distributions were compared to the original model parameters. It was found that in the cases of 60 dB and 40 dB the multiple loading cases resulted in noise reduction in the modulus reconstruction by at least a twofold compared to the single-loading case, at the expense of a 'shadowing' effect (i.e., erroneous modulus estimates) underneath the inclusion that could be eliminated by using larger loading areas for the individual loading cases. Finally, at 20 dB both the large single-load and combined, smaller five-load cases failed to accurately reconstruct the modulus of the inclusion; depicting thus a fundamental limit on the reconstruction method.
机译:在弹性造影中,与使用重建技术获得的弹性特性相比,已经显示出应变估计更可靠。在这项研究中,为了使方法对实验数据中的噪声敏感并受到触诊的临床实践的启发(即使用顺序手指装载),我们研究了使用几种不同较小的准静态载荷案例的效果(而不是整个边界上的一次性负载),错误指示符作为来自每个负载案例的错误的总和。这增加了测量与拟合参数的比率,这使得该方法对随机误差不太敏感。为了证明这种效果,我们计算了二维,四边形,平面 - 应变,一个40×40mm区域的有限元模型的位移,该区域包含圆柱夹杂物(直径为7mm)三倍的钝化件。选择节节压力的比例以产生约0.75%的菌株。然后以从60dB到20dB的相同的信噪比加入已知量的随机位移误差。将弹性模量重建使用嘈杂的位移由单个,总边界,压力负荷(如通常在弹性造影中施加)进行比较,使用来自九个小宽度装载情况的数据进行重建,并将重建的模量分布与原始的分布进行了比较模型参数。发现在60dB和40dB的情况下,与单装箱的效果相比,多重加载案例通过至少一个双重的模量重建导致噪声降低,以牺牲“阴影”效应为代价(即,错误的模量估计值在夹杂物下方可以通过使用更大的装载案例来消除。最后,在20 dB的大型单负载和组合时,较小的五负载情况未能准确地重建包含的模量;因此描绘了重建方法的基本限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号