首页> 外文会议>Optical Fiber Communications Conference >Tradeoffs for Performance in Long-Haul Transmission Systems: A Carrier's Perspective
【24h】

Tradeoffs for Performance in Long-Haul Transmission Systems: A Carrier's Perspective

机译:长途传输系统中绩效的权衡:承运人的观点

获取原文

摘要

Tradeoffs abound in optical transmission system design, and it's critical for carriers to understand their priorities based on network/service characteristics, and select systems that meet their needs at the lowest first and per-channel cost. Now more than ever, it is important for a carrier to have a good view of their network and its needs prior to launching into the search for a new long-haul transmission system. There are a number of tradeoffs that can be made in system design, and having a clear view of network topology, traffic requirements and operational needs can help in finding the best system for a particular carrier's network and application. There is no "one size fits all" system, and each one has been designed with a particular set of costs and capabilities in mind. Of course, lowering costs are foremost in every carrier's mind today when it comes to long-haul transmission systems. A few years ago, the conventional wisdom was to lower costs by putting more and more bandwidth on a fiber, sharing common equipment over more channels and driving down per-wavelength dollars. Today, first wavelength costs are equally important in laying new systems, making sure that cost saving are realized within an achievable time window. Often, achieving the optimum fully-loaded wavelength cost can lead to prohibitive first wavelength costs, and vice-a-versa. Operational costs also play a harder-to-quantify but important role when evaluating system options, and operational savings mechanisms such as power and footprint are considered up-front in decision-making. There are a few network characteristics that are key to setting requirements on a long-haul transmission system: 1) The amount of available fiber, and the fiber type and characteristics 2) The network topology, including distance required between add-drops, service needs at add-drops and number of on/off ramps on a system 3) The service topology, including average distance of wavelengths between customers or grooming points in the network 4) The level of flexibility required of the system, including granularity of add/drops, the need for network reconfiguration at a wavelength level, the need to support a variety of rates and services 5) The amount of automation required of the system, including seamless system turn-up, fault location to a root cause, and wavelength provisioning.
机译:在光传输系统设计中比比皆是,对于基于网络/服务特性来了解他们的优先级,并选择以最低第一和每频道成本满足其需求的系统是至关重要的。现在比以往任何时候都更重要,在启动到寻找新的长途传输系统之前,承运人对其网络的良好观点以及需求非常重要。有许多权衡可以在系统设计中进行,并且可以清楚地了解网络拓扑,流量需求和运营需求可以有助于找到特定运营商的网络和应用的最佳系统。没有“一个尺寸适合所有”系统,每个系统都设计有特定的成本和能力。当然,在长途传输系统方面,每次运营商的脑海都会降低成本最为可能。几年前,传统的智慧是通过在光纤上放宽越来越多的带宽来降低成本,在更多的通道上分享公共设备并驾驶每波长美元。如今,第一个波长成本在铺设新系统时同样重要,确保在可实现的时间窗口中实现了成本节省。通常,实现最佳的完全负载波长成本可能导致禁止的第一波长成本,并且反之亦然。在评估系统选项时,运营成本也更加努力地发挥,但重要的作用,以及在决策中被认为是电力和足迹等操作节省机制。在长途传输系统上设定要求的少数网络特征是:1)可用光纤的量,光纤类型和特性2)网络拓扑,包括加入滴,服务需求之间所需的距离在系统3上的添加液滴和ON / OFF斜坡的数量),服务拓扑结构,包括网络中的客户或梳理点之间的波长的平均距离4)系统所需的灵活性水平,包括添加/滴的粒度,需要在波长级别的网络重新配置,需要支持各种速率和服务5)系统所需的自动化量,包括无缝系统调节,故障位置到根本原因和波长供应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号