首页> 外文会议>IEE Colloquium on Neural and Fuzzy Systems >Neuro-fuzzy approaches to fault diagnosis and identification
【24h】

Neuro-fuzzy approaches to fault diagnosis and identification

机译:神经模糊诊断和识别方法

获取原文

摘要

Systems are becoming increasingly complex, with widespread use made of autonomous controllers, as in the case of decentralised control for complex chemical or flexible manufacturing systems. Furthermore, autonomous control system design focuses on the identification of analytical (as opposed to hardware) 'redundancy' in the form of a control theoretic plant model. The major drawbacks of any such analytical framework are: the computational overheads associated with supporting real time operation and, more significantly, the inability of the detection system performing any fault diagnosis operation to distinguish between modelling errors and the failure modes. This leads to a significant emphasis being placed on identifying a suitably robust representation of the plant. To be more specific, we identify three sources of deviation from the nominal analytical plant model: 1. fault conditions-we interpret these as having a deterministic form; 2. modelling errors-these we classify as having a possibilistic (fuzzy) interpretation; errors as a result of modelling approximations such as over simplification or idealising assumptions; 3. system and measurement noise-this represents a probabilistic (random) source of error.
机译:系统变得越来越复杂,具有自主控制器的广泛用途,如分散化学或柔性制造系统的分散控制的情况。此外,自主控制系统设计侧重于控制理论植物模型的形式的分析(与硬件)“冗余”的识别。任何此类分析框架的主要缺点是:与支持实时操作相关的计算开销,并且更重要地,检测系统的无法无法执行任何故障诊断操作以区分建模误差和故障模式。这导致显着强调识别植物的适当稳健的表示。更具体地说,我们识别三种偏离偏差源自标称分析植物模型:1。断层条件 - 我们将这些归因于具有确定性形式; 2.建模错误 - 这些我们分类为具有可能性的(模糊)解释;由于建模近似,例如超薄或理想假设的误差; 3.系统和测量噪声 - 这代表了概率(随机)的错误源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号