首页> 外文会议>Asian Fuzzy Systems Symposium >Evaluation on neural network and fuzzy method-in terms of learning
【24h】

Evaluation on neural network and fuzzy method-in terms of learning

机译:神经网络和模糊方法的评估 - 在学习方面

获取原文

摘要

Like a dawn light scattering into the cloud sky of AI, neural network and fuzzy logic become state-of-the-art technologies in exploring the intellect. To make a judgement between both technologies, we propose an evaluation on them from the view point of learning classification. Since there are a variety of models proposed within both technologies, we focus on the most significant model, i.e., Back Propagation Network (BPN) (J. McClelland et al., 1986) and Wang's fuzzy rule generator (L.X. Wang and J.M Mendel, 1992). First in the evaluation, we introduce a gravity effect field to illustrate these two models' influence under the existence of one instance. After that, we virtually construct two classification problems and discuss the behaviors of both methods through the gravity effect field. Finally, we propose another two real examples to demonstrate the results. We conclude that Wang's method is more suitable for piecewise region classification and needs more representative or complete training samples than BPN. BPN is more training data tolerant and less network parameter sensible than that of Wang's fuzzy rule generator. However, basic instinct problems still exist, BPN behavior is more black box than fuzzy rule generator.
机译:就像一个黎明光散射进入AI的云天空,神经网络和模糊逻辑成为探索智力的最先进的技术。为了在两种技术之间进行判断,我们从学习分类的观点提出了对它们的评估。由于两种技术中都提出了各种模型,我们专注于最重要的模型,即反向传播网络(BPN)(J.CClelland等,1986)和Wang的模糊规则生成器(LX Wang和JM Mendel, 1992)。首先在评估中,我们引入了重力效应场,以说明在一个实例的存在下的这两个模型的影响。之后,我们实际上构建了两个分类问题,并通过重力效应场讨论了两种方法的行为。最后,我们提出了另外两个真实的例子来证明结果。我们得出结论,王的方法更适合分段区域分类,并且需要比BPN更多的代表性或完整的训练样本。 BPN更加培训数据容忍和较少的网络参数比Wang的模糊规则生成器更少。但是,基本的本能问题仍然存在,BPN行为比模糊规则生成器更为黑盒子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号