首页> 外文会议>ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition >Comparisons and evaluation of turbo-generator and heat-engine driven space based laser power system architectures
【24h】

Comparisons and evaluation of turbo-generator and heat-engine driven space based laser power system architectures

机译:涡轮发电机和热发动机驱动空间激光电力系统架构的比较与评价

获取原文

摘要

Several variations of a notional space based electrical laser power system architecture were evaluated with a general thermal Systems analysis. The analysis and evaluations of technology options and feasibility were based on a baseline laser power system concept that incorporated an advanced solar array/battery power combination. Two closed-loop, dynamic cycle system concepts are of interest here, both using H{sub}2-O{sub}2 to fuel the combustor with the heat engine concept using a PEM fuel cell to regenerate fuel constituents. The first dynamic system is a turbo-generator based concept, and the second is a Brayton cycle based heat engine concept driven by an H{sub}2-O{sub}2 combustor. Each one of these power generation mechanisms has its own advantages and disadvantages. This first-order thermal analysis aims to compare these various options on a common footing such as system mass, in order to arrive at the most suitable configuration from the various options considered. Several technological enhancements were incorporated in the analysis for the H{sub}2-O{sub}2 system concepts with special emphasis and advocacy of the use of extremely efficient cryogenic super conducting generators and cryogenic power conditioning equipment as these components can be cooled with the cryogenic effluents before they are combusted. These systems would supply power to a 23.5% efficient electric laser (50% electric to optical power diode pump, and a 47% optical to optical high power laser) with >8 MW{sub}(rf) of output laser power in most cases. This is an extremely high power level, so we predict the systems to be somewhat massive and on the order of 40 metric tons (MT, 1000 kg) or more with high sensitivity to recharge time. For a one-day recharge time, the H{sub}2-O{sub}2 concept recycling all effluents is twice as massive as the baseline solar system. As the recharge time is extended from one day to more than five, the concept that reclaims the effluents begins to appear more attractive for the turbogenerator-based evaluations. For similar output power, the heat engine based evaluation appears to be more attractive at higher cycle temperatures.
机译:通过一般的热系统分析评估了一个名义空间电激光电力系统架构的几个变体。技术选择和可行性的分析和评估基于基线激光电力系统概念,该概念包含先进的太阳能阵列/电池电量组合。这里有两个闭环,动态循环系统概念在这里,使用H {Sub} 2-O {Sub} 2使用PEM燃料电池将燃烧器与热引擎概念加油,以再生燃料成分。第一动态系统是基于涡轮发电机的概念,第二个是由H {Sub} 2-O} 2燃烧器驱动的Brayton循环的热引擎概念。这些发电机制中的每一个都具有自己的优点和缺点。本一阶热量分析旨在将这些各种选项进行比较诸如系统质量的常见基础,以便从考虑的各种选项到达最合适的配置。在H {Sub} 2-O} 2系统概念的分析中纳入了几种技术改进,特别强调和倡导使用极其有效的低温超级导电发电机和低温功率调节设备,因为这些组件可以冷却在它们燃烧之前的低温流出物。这些系统在大多数情况下,这些系统将在23.5%高效的电气激光器(50%电力至光学电源二极管泵和47%光学高功率激光器)中供电,在大多数情况下。这是一个极高的功率水平,因此我们预测系统稍微大量,大约40公吨(MT,1000 kg)或更高的敏感性,以便充电时间。为期一天的充电时间,H {Sub} 2-O {Sub} 2概念回收所有流出物的概念是基线太阳系的两倍。随着充电时间从一天延长到五年以上,回收污水的概念开始对基于涡轮机制的评估开始看起来更具吸引力。对于类似的输出功率,基于热力发动机的评估在较高的循环温度下似乎更具吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号