首页> 外文会议>Military Communications Conference >Comparisons of CFAR burst detection schemes for TDMA systems employing constant modulus modulation format
【24h】

Comparisons of CFAR burst detection schemes for TDMA systems employing constant modulus modulation format

机译:CFAR突发检测方案的比较采用恒定模量调制格式的TDMA系统

获取原文

摘要

The performances of constant false-alarm rate (CFAR) burst detection schemes are analyzed and compared for a communication system which employs constant modulus modulation format and a typical time division multiple access (TDMA) protocol. The burst detection probabilities are derived to incorporate the received signal quality measure which can be expressed as a function of cross-ambiguity function. Therefore the performance loss due to receiver's frequency and/or timing mis-match can be easily computed by evaluating the auto-ambiguity function of the transmitted signal. The single window ratio detection (SWRD) scheme is compared with double window ratio detection (DWRD) scheme, which we newly propose, in terms of the robustness against the degradation of the received signal quality. It turns out that the SWRD scheme is very sensitive to the received signal quality degradation, i.e., huge performance loss is incurred even for a relatively small degradation of the received signal quality. On the other hand, the DWRD scheme offers much less sensitive performance loss to the degradation of the received signal quality and can be operated in adaptive mode.
机译:分析恒定假警报速率(CFAR)突发检测方案的性能,并将其与采用恒定模量调制格式的通信系统和典型的时分多址(TDMA)协议进行比较。导出突发检测概率以结合所接收的信号质量度量,该信号质量测量值可以表示为交叉模糊函数的函数。因此,通过评估发送信号的自模糊函数,可以容易地计算引起的接收器频率和/或时序匹配引起的性能损失。将单个窗口比检测(SWRD)方案与我们新提出的双窗比检测(DWRD)方案进行比较,以鲁棒性反对接收信号质量的劣化。事实证明,SWRD方案对接收的信号质量劣化非常敏感,即即使对于接收信号质量的较小劣化也是巨大的性能损失。另一方面,DWRD方案为接收信号质量的劣化提供了更少的敏感性能损失,并且可以以自适应模式操作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号