首页> 外文会议>Annual Vertical Flight Society Forum and Technology Display >VARIATIONAL TOLERANCE ANALYSIS (VTA) - DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING OPTIMIZATION USING STATISTICAL SIMULATION: 2021 Robert L. Lichten Award Winner
【24h】

VARIATIONAL TOLERANCE ANALYSIS (VTA) - DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING OPTIMIZATION USING STATISTICAL SIMULATION: 2021 Robert L. Lichten Award Winner

机译:变形公差分析(VTA) - 使用统计模拟设计和制造优化:2021 Robert L. LiChten奖得主

获取原文

摘要

Appropriate consideration of tolerances is critical to the design and manufacture of products that meet customer requirements and defined cost targets. Tolerance analysis is most commonly conducted at the individual part or sub-assembly level utilizing basic stack-up methods (worst-case analysis) to ensure the producibility of the assembled product. A worst-case analysis assumes that each dimension in the stack-up will be manufactured on the extreme end or limit of its assigned tolerance (max or min) in such a way that all tolerances become additive. This usually results in tighter than required drawing tolerances being assigned to guarantee the product can be assembled. Modern day manufacturing processes focus on targeting the nominal dimensional value, so it is safe to assume that a higher number of parts will be produced closer to the nominal value than parts produced at the extreme end of the tolerance range. When evaluating the tolerance stack-up of a larger assembly with many parts additional tolerance analysis methods apply (Root Sum Squared, RSS), and a worst-case analysis becomes more costly and less meaningful. The RSS method of tolerance analysis takes into consideration manufacturing targets and applies normal distribution methods to assess more likely tolerance results, allowing relaxed drawing tolerances to be assigned while still maintaining a high level of confidence in a successful assembly. For analysis of complex systems or installations, tolerance studies using more sophisticated approaches to deal with variation such as Monte Carlo statistical analysis is required. Variational Tolerance Analysis (VTA) tools available today allow a typical Monte Carlo tolerance simulation to be visualized by the designer through 3-dimensional real time manufacturing simulations and sensitivity analysis. This in turn simplifies the development process and allows better identification of tolerance drivers within a large system installation; analysis of the geometric effect of tolerances within the installation: and the ability to quickly iterate the analysis to optimize designs for producibility and lower cost.In this paper, the use of VTA is assessed and quantified to form a business case for further investment by Lockheed Martin. In the course of this work, VTA has been evaluated both before and after final designs were released to manufacturing. Before final designs are released VTA can be used for design optimization (i.e. build before you build simulations), part sequencing studies, or to gain insight into the assembly installation process enabling advanced planning to take place up front. VTA can also address challenges discovered after final designs have been released to manufacturing and parts are on hand (i. e. during the build) such as: assembly issues, out of spec part disposition, and to inform manufacturing of any special tooling or part rework considerations aiding in corrective action or risk mitigation plans.Cost savings to the business due to the implementation of VTA has been demonstrated in 4 distinct ways:1. Reduced design revisions - Design optimization up front reduces future revisions caused by producibility and tolerance related discoveries.2. Manufacturing - Through tolerance optimization, non-impactful tolerances can be relaxed while still ensuring a successful assembly.3. Reduced build schedule - Increased assembly awareness and advanced planning allows a streamlined production process with risk mitigation strategies in place.4. Reduced scrap, rework, repair (SRR) - Engineering labor to disposition out of spec parts is reduced by entering as-measured tolerances into the simulation model to assess the overall impact to installation success.The conclusion is VTA simulations provide measurable benefits to the business through robust design optimization, and multi-layered cost and risk reductions.
机译:公差的适当的考虑是产品的设计和制造关键满足客户的要求,并确定成本目标。公差分析是在利用基本堆叠起来的方法(最坏情况分析),以确保装配产品的可生产单个部件或子组件级最常进行的。最坏的情况下,分析假设在堆栈向上每个维度将在分配给它的容差(最大或最小)的最末端或限制在这样一种方式,所有的公差成为添加剂来制造。这通常会导致更严格的比所需要的绘制公差被分配给保证产品可被组装。现代制造过程集中于靶向的标称尺寸值,所以它是安全的假设份的较高数量会产生更接近比在公差范围的最末端生产的部件的标称值。当许多零件装配评估公差叠加较大的额外公差分析方法适用于(根平方和,RSS)和最坏情况分析变得更加昂贵,意义不大。公差分析的RSS方法考虑生产目标和应用正态分布的方法来评估更可能容忍的结果,允许同时仍保持在一个成功组装的高度信任被分配轻松绘制公差。对于复杂的系统或装置的分析,采用更复杂的方法宽容研究,以应对变化,如需要蒙特卡洛统计分析。变容差分析(VTA)工具,可今天让一个典型的蒙特卡洛模拟耐受由设计师通过三维实时仿真制造和敏感性分析进行可视化。这反过来又简化了开发过程,并允许更好地确定一个大的系统安装在容许范围内的驱动程序;的公差的安装中的几何效应分析:和能够快速迭代分析以优化设计了可生产性并降低cost.In本文使用VTA的是评估和量化,以形成用于通过洛克希德进一步投资商业案例马丁。在这项工作的过程中,VTA已经前后最终设计发布到制造评估。最终设计发布之前VTA可用于设计优化(即构建构建模拟之前),部分测序研究,或者洞察装配安装过程中支持先进的规划发生了前面。 VTA还可以最终设计后,发现地址挑战已经发布到制造和零部件手头上(即在生成过程中),如:装配问题,不符合规范的部分处置,并通知制造任何特殊的工具或零件返工考虑帮助在纠正措施或减轻风险plans.Cost储蓄业务由于VTA的执行已被证明在4种不同的方式:1。减少设计修改 - 优化设计了前减少因可生产性和耐受性相关discoveries.2将来的版本。制造业 - 通过容忍优化,非影响力公差可以同时仍能确保成功assembly.3放松。减少构建计划 - 增加装配意识和先进的规划工具可以与place.4风险缓解策略简化生产工艺。减少废品,返工,返修(SRR) - 工程劳动力配置不符合规范的部分都被作为进入测量误差为仿真模型,以评估安装success.The结论的总体影响是降低VTA模拟向企业提供可衡量的好处通过强大的设计优化和多层次的成本和风险的降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号