首页> 外文会议>Innovation for Systems Information and Decision >Multi-criteria Group Decision Support System Multi Cultural Experiments
【24h】

Multi-criteria Group Decision Support System Multi Cultural Experiments

机译:多标准组决策支持系统多重文化实验

获取原文

摘要

In this paper we discuss comparative results about three experiments that have been conducted using a Multi-Criteria Group Decision Support Systems. The three experiments were conducted in France, in Canada and in Brazil. The two first experiments are already published in references [8] and [9]. We report in this paper, the experiment conducted in Brazil and we compare the results in the three countries. Master students in Brazil, used the developed system called GRUS, in order to see how the participants to a group decision making process feel comfortable using shared criteria but also private criteria. The used methodology was the following: three hypothesis are proposed which are: 1) there is a need to use private and common criteria in a collaborative decision making process; 2) the number of private and common criteria should be the same; 3) the use of GDSS remains difficult without a human facilitator. After each experiment the participants answered to a semi-directed questionnaire. The results are then analyzed to see if the three hypothesis are verified in each country. As main result of this study we can assume than two of the three hypothesis are verified but the third one is not or partially verified.
机译:在本文中,我们讨论了关于使用多标准组决策支持系统进行的三个实验的比较结果。这三个实验是在法国进行的,在加拿大和巴西。第一个实验已经发表在参考文献[8]和[9]中公布。我们在本文中报告,在巴西进行的实验,我们比较了三个国家的结果。巴西师范学生,使用了叫做Grus的发达系统,以了解参与者如何使用共享标准的群体决策过程感到舒适,还有私人标准。使用的方法如下:提出了三个假设,即:1)需要在协作决策过程中使用私人和共同标准; 2)私人和常见标准的数量应该是相同的; 3)如果没有人力促进者,使用GDS仍然困难。在每次实验之后,参与者回答了半导地位问卷。然后分析结果,看看每个国家是否核实了三个假设。作为本研究的主要结果,我们可以验证三个假设中的两个,但第三个没有或部分验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号