首页> 外文会议>SPE Europec featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition >Calibration of the Mixing Parameter Model for Viscous Fingering for Varying Water Alternate Gas WAG Ratios and Slug Sizes
【24h】

Calibration of the Mixing Parameter Model for Viscous Fingering for Varying Water Alternate Gas WAG Ratios and Slug Sizes

机译:不同水交替气体摇率和粘帘尺寸的粘性指法混合参数模型的校准

获取原文

摘要

Water alternating gas (WAG) injection is a method of controlling the viscous fingering impact in a miscible flooding processes to improve the volumetric sweep efficiency. The WAG technique is a mix of two conventional techniques: gas injection to improve the microscopic displacement efficiency and water flooding to improve the sweep efficiency. Overall, WAG improves the oil recovery. Conventional reservoir simulation is too coarse to resolve fingers accurately at field scale. This is because the fingers maybe smaller than field scale grid blocks. Instead, empirical models are used to describe the fingers and to allow simulators to predict realistic recovery. Effective parameter models such as Todd and Longstaff (1972) are used to model the effects of viscous fingering in field scale. This model is the most commonly used among different reservoir simulators, because it requires the selection of a mixing parameter, ω, whose value includes all of the factors affecting fingering. Additionally, it incorporates a method to calculate the effective viscosity when mixing occurs between oil and gas phases. Todd and Longstaff (1972) recommended a mixing parameter ω = 2/3 for miscible injection to match the recovery of oil from Blackwell et al.'s (1959) experiments. They recommended ω = 1/3 - 2/3 to account for field scale heterogeneities. Blunt and Christie (1993) showed that the mixing parameter, ω, needs to be calibrated for WAG injection. They calibrated the value of the mixing parameter, ω, as a function of the fractional flow of injected water. These equations are self-consistent, modified from the effective Todd and Longstaff mobility ratio and have been precisely solved in one dimension to account for fingering in three component systems. But their work was limited to simultaneous injection of water and gas. In this paper we examine how calibration of ω varies with finite slug size for different WAG ratios using a 1D model. The results show that as the slug size increases, the value of mixing parameter ω, decreases. The value of mixing parameter ω is computed to match the concentration and saturation profiles from 2D simulation.
机译:交替气体(摇摆)注射是一种控制在可混溶的洪水过程中粘性起义的方法,以提高体积扫描效率。 WAG技术是两种常规技术的混合:气体注射,以提高微观位移效率和水驱以提高扫描效率。总的来说,摇摆提高了储油。传统的储库仿真太粗糙,在现场比例下准确地解决手指。这是因为手指可能小于现场缩放网格块。相反,经验模型用于描述手指并允许模拟器预测现实的恢复。诸如TODD和LONGSTAFD(1972)之类的有效参数模型用于模拟粘性指法在现场规模中的影响。该模型是不同储层模拟器中最常用的,因为它需要选择混合参数ω,其值包括影响指法的所有因素。另外,在油和气相之间发生混合时,它包含一种方法来计算有效粘度。 TODD和Longstaff(1972)推荐混合参数ω= 2/3用于可混溶注射,以与Blackwell等人的恢复匹配。(1959)实验。他们推荐ω= 1/3 - 2/3来计算现场比例异质性。 Blunt和Christie(1993)表明,需要校准混合参数ω,以便摇摆喷射。它们校准混合参数ω的值ω,作为注入水的分数流量的函数。这些方程是自我一致的,从有效的达DD和长足的迁移率偏移修改,并在一个维度中精确解决,以解释在三个组件系统中的指法。但他们的工作仅限于同时注入水和天然气。在本文中,我们检查Ω的校准如何随着使用1D模型的不同WAG比率而具有有限的窗口尺寸。结果表明,随着块尺寸的增加,混合参数ω的值减小。计算混合参数ω的值,以匹配2D模拟中的浓度和饱和度配置文件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号