首页> 外文会议>Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Conference >Field evaluation of selected introgression clones for their resistance to root-knot nematode
【24h】

Field evaluation of selected introgression clones for their resistance to root-knot nematode

机译:所选血栓克隆对根结线虫的抵抗力的现场评估

获取原文

摘要

Sugarcane nematodes, root-knot (RKN) and root-lesion (RLN), cause an estimated loss of over $80 million per year to the Australian sugar industry. In particular, RKN is a major problem if sugarcane is planted in sandy soil. No effective control method is available for sugarcane nematodes in Australia. Crop rotation and fallowing provide only short-term control and nematode populations usually bounce back within 12 months after these control methods. The use of nematicides is restricted due to inconsistent results, difficulty in application and the highly toxic nature of the chemicals to humans and the environment. No commercial cultivars are resistant to sugarcane nematodes. Recent glasshouse trials in Australia suggested that clones from introgression populations, originating from crossing between commercial canes and Saccharum spontaneum or Erianthus arundinaceus, possessed good resistance to root-knot nematodes. Field trials were established to determine the reliability of glasshouse resistance-screening results. Eight introgression clones that showed resistance to RKN in glasshouse trials were evaluated in a field in Wallaville, north of Childers. Test clones were planted in plots with high and low nematode populations and maintained up to the second-ratoon crop. Trial plots were assessed for nematodes each year 6 weeks after planting and ratooning. Three years of results showed that 7 of 8 introgression clones consistently maintained low numbers of RKN until the end of the trial period, and significantly (P<0.05) lower numbers of RKN (195 nematodes per kg of soil) compared to commercial standards (1500 nematodes per kg of soil). There was no difference in numbers of nematodes high and low nematode treatments after the second ratoon. These results suggested that the glasshouse-screening trials are reliable and can predict the field resistance of clones for RKN, and that introgression clones are a valuable source of resistance to these important pathogens/pests. Commercial cultivars Q208Φ and Q240Φ maintained high yield despite very high numbers of RKN, suggesting that these clones might be tolerant to RKN.
机译:甘蔗线虫,根结(RKN)和根病变(RLN),导致澳大利亚糖业每年估计超过8000万美元。特别是,如果甘蔗种植在沙质土壤中,则RKN是一个主要问题。澳大利亚的甘蔗线虫没有有效的控制方法。作物旋转和跌倒仅提供短期控制,线虫群体通常在这些控制方法后12个月内反弹。由于结果不一致,应用困难以及化学品对人类和环境的高毒性本质,使用杀线虫。没有商业品种耐甘蔗线虫。澳大利亚最近的GlassHouse试验表明,来自商业披肩和Saccharum Spontaneum或Erianthus arundinausus之间的斜进入血栓血液的克隆具有良好的根结线虫抵抗力。建立了现场试验,以确定玻璃池阻力筛查结果的可靠性。在童车北部的Wallaville的一个领域中评估了对Glasshouse试验中RKN的抗血液克隆的含膜克隆,在童车北部的一个领域。用高低线虫种群种植测试克隆,并维持到第二次Ratoon作物。在种植和衡量后6周内每年评估试验情节。三年的结果表明,8个中毒克隆中的7个含量持续保持较少的RKN,直至试用期结束,而且与商业标准相比,显着(P <0.05)较低的RKN数量(每千克土壤)(1500每千克土壤的线虫)。第二个液滴后线虫数量高和低线虫处理没有差异。这些结果表明,玻璃室筛查试验可靠,可以预测RKN克隆的抗磁场抗性,并且血液克隆是对这些重要病原体/害虫的有价值的抵抗来源。商业品种Q208φ和Q240φ尽管RKN数量非常高,但暗示这些克隆可能耐受RKN。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号