首页> 外文会议>European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery >Study of Effectiveness of Different Surfactants for Wettability Alterations on Reservoir Rocks for improved Oil Recovery
【24h】

Study of Effectiveness of Different Surfactants for Wettability Alterations on Reservoir Rocks for improved Oil Recovery

机译:水库岩石润湿性改变对不同表面活性剂的效果研究

获取原文

摘要

Chemical reservoir stimulation enhancement, such as enabled by surfactant selection, is an important technique to improve reserves recovery. Recovery efficiency is improved considerably by altering reservoir rock wettability from oil-wet to water-wet, thus enhancing water imbibition into oil saturated rock. This paper presents a comparative study on effectiveness of different surfactants (cationic, non-ionic and anionic) to alter wettability of reservoir rocks (sandstone and carbonate). Contact angle measurements were used to determine wettability of oil-wet rock surfaces of sandstone and carbonate reservoir samples using six surfactants, A, B, C, D, E, and F, of different ionic natures. Contact angle of a 100- L liquid droplet of 0.5% surfactant solution after 60 seconds soaking time was measured using a microscope. By general convention, contact angle >90° is oil-wet and < 90° is water-wet. To evaluate oil sweep efficiency, three ionic natured surfactants (C, D, and E) were selected for column flow testing. Results showed that Surfactants C (non-ionic) and E (anionic) demonstrated most effective wettability alteration of oil-wet sandstone. Surfactant E reduced contact angle to the range of 0 to 12° for all the cases. Surfactant C reduced contact angle in the range 0-31°. Surfactant D (cationic), however, showed poor performance for most of the sandstone (0°-111°). For carbonate samples, all the surfactants showed low contact angles. Column flow tests on oil-wet sand columns showed that Surfactant E helped oil sweep, as evident from the amount of oil collected from the column with time. Surfactant C showed the poorest oil recovery performance among the three. For a carbonate column, Surfactant D showed the best performance and E showed the poorest oil recovery results. For initial screening, contact angle measurement is important; however, intrinsic wetting characteristic of . the surfactants is vital in terms of oil sweeping efficiency, as demonstrated in column flow testing. Hence, this study suggests that E should be the choice of surfactant for oil sweeping in sandstone formations and D would show best oil sweeping in carbonate reservoirs in both cases with the mineralogical, oil type and treatment fluid type tested. Wettability alteration of reservoir rock surfaces is important to increase relative permeability of hydrocarbons. Selecting an appropriate surfactant to the reservoir mineralogy and with treatment fluid characteristics is crucial for surfactant facilitated oil recovery. This paper describes the importance of selecting an appropriate surfactant to alter rock wettability, thus increasing oil sweeping, which is crucial for oil recovery.
机译:化学储层刺激增强,如表面活性剂选择,是改善储备恢复的重要技术。通过将储层岩石润湿性从油湿到水湿来改变储层岩石润湿性,从而提高了恢复效率,从而增强了油饱和岩石中的水。本文介绍了不同表面活性剂(阳离子,非离子和阴离子)的有效性对储层岩石润湿性(砂岩和碳酸盐)的效果的对比研究。使用不同离子自然的六种表面活性剂,A,B,C,D,E和F确定砂岩和碳酸盐储层样品的油湿岩表面的润湿性的润湿性。使用显微镜测量60秒后,0.5%表面活性剂溶液的100L液滴的接触角。通过通用惯例,接触角> 90°是油湿的,水湿润,<90°是水湿的。为了评估油扫效率,选择三种离子自给度表面活性剂(C,D和E)用于柱流动测试。结果表明,表面活性剂C(非离子)和E(阴离子)表现出油湿砂岩的最有效的润湿性改变。对于所有情况,表面活性剂E减小接触角到0至12°的范围。表面活性剂C在0-31°范围内降低接触角。然而,表面活性剂D(阳离子)对大多数砂岩(0°-111°)表现出差的性能。对于碳酸盐样品,所有表面活性剂显示出低接触角。油湿砂柱上的柱流试验显示,表面活性剂E帮助油扫描,从中从柱子中收集的油量明显。表面活性剂C表明三者中最糟糕的采油性能。对于碳酸粒子,表面活性剂D显示了最佳性能,E显示出最贫困的采油结果。对于初始筛选,接触角测量很重要;但是,内在润湿特性。表面活性剂在扫描效率方面至关重要,如列流测试中所示。因此,本研究表明E应该是砂岩地层综合的表面活性剂,D将在两种情况下展示矿物学,油式和处理流体型碳酸盐储层中的最佳油。储层岩石表面的润湿性改变对于增加烃的相对渗透性是重要的。选择适当的表面活性剂到储层矿物学和处理流体特性对于表面活性剂促进的采油是至关重要的。本文介绍了选择适当的表面活性剂以改变岩石润湿性的重要性,从而增加石油扫描,这对石油回收至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号