首页> 外文会议>World renewable energy forum >COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR LONG -TERM STORAGE OF SOLAR ENERGY FOR ELECTRIC PRODUCTION
【24h】

COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR LONG -TERM STORAGE OF SOLAR ENERGY FOR ELECTRIC PRODUCTION

机译:电力生产太阳能储存方法的比较

获取原文

摘要

An ammonia thermochemical energy storage cycle was simulated with TRNSYS and MATLAB. The collector was a parabolic dish with a receiver/dissociation reactor at the focal point. Major sources of loss in the receiver were due to convection and emitted radiation terms, both of which were directly related to the average receiver temperature. The product gases (nitrogen and hydrogen) were stored at ambient temperature. To produce electricity, a catalytic reactor was used to reform ammonia and release heat to drive a Stirling engine. Overall efficiency of the solar ammonia cycle system was found to be a strong function of synthesis reactor temperature, ranging from ~2% at 500 K to ~18% at 800 K. In contrast, the dissociation reactor temperature was found to have relatively little effect on efficiency. Performance was compared against compressed air energy storage (CAES), pumped hydroelectric energy storage (PHES), and vanadium flow batteries, with reported round-trip (electricity-storage-electricity) efficiencies of 82%, 75%, and 74%, respectively. For comparison with the ammonia system, these efficiencies were integrated with that of a dish Stirling system for producing the original electricity. The overall (solar-electric-storage-electric) efficiencies of the CAES, vanadium flow battery, and PHES systems ranged from ~10% to ~18% for solar receiver temperature of 500 K to 800 K. For dissociation and synthesis reactor temperatures of 800 K, efficiency of the ammonia system was 18%, comparable to the alternatives. However, the ammonia thermochemical energy storage system has the advantage that solar energy can be stored indefinitely, whereas the other storage mechanisms involve time-dependent losses.
机译:氨热能量存储周期进行模拟TRNSYS和MATLAB。集电极是抛物面与在焦点处的接收器/解离反应器中。在接收器中损失的主要来源是由于对流和发射的辐射而言,两者都是直接相关的平均接收器温度。产物气体(氮和氢)中在室温下储存。以产生电力,催化反应器是用来改革氨和释放热量以驱动斯特林发动机。太阳能氨循环系统的整体效率被认为是合成反应器温度的强函数,范围从约2%,在500 K至〜18%,在800 K.相反,解离反应器的温度被发现具有相对小的作用在效率上。性能对压缩空气能量存储(CAES),抽水蓄能储能(PHES),和钒液流电池,与报道的往返(蓄电-电力)的82%,75%的效率和74%,分别进行比较。为了与氨系统相比,这些效率用一个菜斯特林系统用于产生原始电一体化。的CAES的整体(太阳能电存储电)效率,钒液流电池,和PHES系统范围为〜10%至〜18%为500的K太阳能接收器温度至800 K.对于解离和合成反应器的温度800 K,氨系统的效率为18%,相媲美的替代品。然而,氨热化学能量存储系统具有的优点是太阳能可以无限期地保存,而另一个存储机制涉及依赖于时间的损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号