首页> 外文会议>IAEE International Conference >Old energy security issues,new energy security issues: the upcoming geopolitics of the circular economy
【24h】

Old energy security issues,new energy security issues: the upcoming geopolitics of the circular economy

机译:旧的能源安全问题,新能源安全问题:即将到来的循环经济地缘政治

获取原文

摘要

For several years now,several authors have pointed out the redefinition of geopolitics pending the energy transition,with particular attention given to the potential for largely increased shares of renewable electricity in energy production and consumption.Some posited links are straightforward: for instance,the geopolitical importance of reserves of fossil fuels may give way to an enhanced role for rare earth elements reserves,with distributional consequences across countries and regions.Other links are more indirect,such as the power dynamics involved in the construction and management of regional supergrids,intended to make demand response more effective.In this paper,I argue that the growing popularity of circular economy principles alongside this energy transition adds a layer of complexity to these developments.In one potential complication,drastically increased demand for renewable energy technology will both deplete specific resources and increase their value,augmenting pressure to adopt circular economy principles.On the face of it,this is a welcomed development,as a broader transition toward these principles is needed to ensure sustainability in the century to come.However,in implementing circular economy principles in this context,concerns related to security of supply may result in a multiplication of protectionist measures,potentially locking out some countries from access to materials and,ultimately,end services.In other words,the"circles"of circular economies in various sectors may be closed,not just in the resource management sense(by ensuring that re-use and recycling of materials is maximized within the economy);rather,political,economic and social rationales may lead to policies that put such a high value on reusing materials found in manufactured products that they in fact become equivalent to restricting access to the materials themselves,however plentiful they may be overall.These rationales,even if they do not go as far as creating shortages of essential materials for some populations,create uncertainty with regard to geopolitical developments,which can lead to either zero-sum games or cooperation,depending on the paths chosen by governments around the world.
机译:几年来,若干作者指出了拓展能源过渡的地缘政治的重新定义,特别关注能源生产和消费中的可再生电力股份大部分增加。有些假设链接是简单的:例如,地缘政治化石燃料储量的重要性可能会使稀土元素储备的增强作用,以及各国和地区的分布后果。其他链接更加间接,例如涉及区域超级的建设和管理的权力动力学,打算让需求反应更有效。在本文中,我认为循环经济原则的普及越来越受到这种能源转变的普及,这对这些发展增加了一层复杂性。在一个潜在的并发症,对可再生能源技术的急剧增加,既耗尽特定资源并增加他们的价值,增强压力e要采取循环经济原则。这是一个受欢迎的发展,随着对这些原则的更广泛的过渡,需要在本世纪的可持续发展中来到。然而,在这方面实施循环经济原则,有关的关注供应安全可能导致保护主义措施的乘以,潜在地锁定一些来自物料的国家,最终终端服务。在其他方面,各个部门的循环经济中的“圆圈”可能是关闭的,而不仅仅是在资源管理意义(通过确保在经济内最大化材料的重复使用和回收最大化);相反,政治,经济和社会理由可能导致对他们在制造产品中发现的重用材料进行如此高价值的政策事实是相当于限制对材料的进入自己,然而他们可能是整体的。这些理由,即使他们不得创造短缺o F基本材料对于一些人口,在地缘政治发展方面产生不确定性,这可能导致零和游戏或合作,具体取决于世界各国政府选择的道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号