首页> 外文会议>Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics >Scientometrics for Coauthorship of Big Science: A case study of LHC
【24h】

Scientometrics for Coauthorship of Big Science: A case study of LHC

机译:大学教育科学资料学 - 以LHC为例

获取原文

摘要

In conclusion, the coauthorship of big science has promising and encouraging results. The major finding is that 1. The coauthorship of big science is large-scale: per paper have about 18 coauthors, and some papers have thousands of authors. 2. The coauthorship of big science is centralized: every author has many coauthors. Especially, the average amount of the coauthors per productive author is about 136. 3. The coauthorship network composed of productive authors is a small-world network: average distance of the network is 1.6241, and its average cluster coefficient is 0.855.
机译:总之,对大科学的共同奉献有前景和令人鼓舞的结果。主要的发现是,大科学的共同性是大规模的:每篇论文有大约18名同轴素,有些论文有成千上万的作者。 2.对大科学的共同组织是集中的:每个作者都有很多同志。特别是,每个生产作者的共同忠诚的平均金额约为136. 3.由生产作者组成的共同组合网络是一个小世界网络:网络的平均距离为1.6241,其平均簇系数为0.855。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号