首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering >SPECTRAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF PLATE SURFACE HOT-SPOTS: A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO THE STRESS DIRECTION ISSUE
【24h】

SPECTRAL FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF PLATE SURFACE HOT-SPOTS: A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO THE STRESS DIRECTION ISSUE

机译:板表面热点的光谱疲劳分析:对应力方向问题的实用解决方案

获取原文

摘要

Spectral Fatigue Analysis using coupled hydrodynamics and finite element models has now become a common practice for the fatigue strength assessment of offshore units, with established procedures given in Classification Rules. However, users are facing a practical issue that is almost never mentioned in the procedures. Indeed, many fatigue hot-spots are located on a plate surface, as opposed to plate edges. For such hot-spots, the finite element model results are the three components of the plane-stress stress tensor. Therefore, the outcome of the Spectral Fatigue Analysis is a set of three transfer functions (RAOs). On the other hand, our industry s practice regarding the fatigue strength model is still the proven « design S-N curve » approach in combination with the Palmgren-Miner s damage summation. As a consequence, today the engineer is left with no clear instruction about the proper way how to close this gap between the three stress RAOs on the one hand, and the single stress S-N curve on the other hand. If any advice is given, it is most often to consider the principal stresses, tentatively extending to spectral analysis the classification rule load cases approach. However, principal stress determination is a non-linear procedure that is not compatible with spectral analysis in frequency domain. Turning the spectral results into time domain to overcome this limitation is extremely costly and is not straightforward. Of course, a rational solution to this issue would be the adoption of a multiaxial fatigue damage criteria in lieu of the uniaxial S-N curve. But until such a multiaxial fatigue criteria is widely accepted in our industry, users have to square the circle, and force their stress tensor RAOs into the existing rule criteria. In this paper, a practical solution to reconcile plane stress results and conventional S-N curve criterion in spectral fatigue is proposed: the "facet approach ".
机译:使用耦合流体动力学和有限元模型的光谱疲劳分析现在已成为海上单位疲劳强度评估的常见做法,在分类规则中提供的既定程序。但是,用户面临的实际问题几乎在程序中几乎从未提及过。实际上,许多疲劳热点位于板表面上,而不是板边缘。对于这种热点,有限元模型结果是平面应力应力张量的三个部件。因此,光谱疲劳分析的结果是一组三个转移函数(RAOS)。另一方面,我们的行业对疲劳强度模型的做法仍然是验证的«设计S-N曲线»与Palmgren-Miner造成伤害求和相结合的方法。因此,今天工程师留下没有明确的指示,即如何一方面履行三个应力raos之间的正确方法,另一方面是单个应力S-n曲线。如果给出了任何建议,最常见的是考虑主要压力,暂时延伸以频谱分析分类规则负载案例方法。然而,主应力测定是一种非线性过程,其与频域中的光谱分析不兼容。将光谱结果转换为时域以克服此限制是非常昂贵的并且不简单。当然,对这个问题的理性解决方案是采用多轴疲劳损伤标准代替单轴S-N曲线。但在我们的行业广泛接受这种多轴疲劳标准之前,用户必须突出圆圈,并强迫将其压力张力RAO转化为现有的规则标准。在本文中,提出了一种在光谱疲劳中协调平面应力结果和传统S-N曲线标准的实际解决方案:“小平法”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号