首页> 外文会议>Annual international symposium of International Council on Systems Engineering >On Systems Architects and Systems Architecting: some thoughts on explaining and improving the art and science of systems architecting
【24h】

On Systems Architects and Systems Architecting: some thoughts on explaining and improving the art and science of systems architecting

机译:关于系统架构师和系统架构:关于解释和改进系统艺术和科学的一些思考

获取原文

摘要

ISO’s process to adopt the IEEE 1471 standard on architecture descriptions has revealed of the order of 130 standards concerning or relating to architectures and architecting. Within the “enterprise architecture” theme alone, different people use the term to refer to mean quite different things: the “architecture of the enterprise as a system”; the enterprise context for the enterprise IT system; or the architecture of the enterprise IT system itself. A focus on tools and methods has led to confusion between the creative activity of “architecting”, by which I mean making or exposing the key strategic decisions about the purpose, organisation, behaviour and critical design features of the system, and the analytical and descriptive activity of architecture modelling, which supports and captures the results of architecting. The INCOSE UK Architecture Working Group established a “belief systems” methodology to explore and seek to reconcile the many conflicting views on architecting This paper expands on the views presented by the author at the IS08 Architecture panel session in an effort to identify and communicate a better understanding of the fundamental skills, principles, philosophy and approach underpinning effective systems architecting. It seeks to improve their integration by focusing on “purpose, context and process” of architecting with the perspective that “hard systems exist inside soft systems”, and to show that “lean pull” allows architecting to focus on the intended use of its products rather than adherence to process standard or frameworks.
机译:ISO在架构描述中采用IEEE 1471标准的过程揭示了130个关于或与架构和架构有关的标准。在“企业架构”的主题中单独,不同的人使用术语来提到意思是完全不同的东西:“企业体系结构作为系统”;企业IT系统的企业背景;或企业IT系统本身的体系结构。专注于工具和方法导致了“架构”的创造性活动之间的混淆,我的意思是制造或暴露有关系统的目的,组织,行为和关键设计特征的关键战略决策,以及分析和描述架构建模的活动,支持并捕获架构的结果。煽动英国建筑工作组建立了一个“信仰系统”方法,探索并寻求协调架构的许多相互矛盾的观点本文扩展了作者在IS08架构面板会议上提出的观点,以旨在识别和沟通更好了解基础技能,原则,哲学和方法支撑有效系统架构。它试图通过专注于架构的“目的,上下文和过程”,以“软系统内的硬系统存在”,并显示“精益拉动”,并展示“精益拉动”允许架构专注于其产品的预期用途而不是遵守过程标准或框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号