首页> 外文会议>Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology >Comparative legislation, corporate policy, and citizen concerns: Legal solutions for privacy protection in cloud computing
【24h】

Comparative legislation, corporate policy, and citizen concerns: Legal solutions for privacy protection in cloud computing

机译:比较法例,企业政策和公民担忧:云计算中的隐私保护法律解决方案

获取原文

摘要

Cloud computing presents unique opportunities for economic efficiency and personal convenience. Ever-greater numbers of devices are connected to the cloud, and the "Internet of Things" is creating further opportunities for data gathering, feedback, and positive effects ranging from better consumer experiences to environmental resource conservation. However, cloud technology and information storage have increasingly come under fire on various fronts for failing to protect consumer rights. Hacking incidents have cost extensive time and money, and spying and monitoring of citizen data by governments inside and outside of the cloud have been criticized by privacy rights advocates. Countries from the EU to the US and China have disputed the motives and actions of governmental and corporate actors from other markets under the guises of cybersecurity and cybersovereignty, focusing complaints on violations of citizen privacy. This article serves three central purposes: (1) Identifying proposals for management of cloud technology from three main sources: legislation in key jurisdictions, corporate policies, and civil society. (2) Comparing these proposals and finding common ground that may allow regulation of cloud technology internationally to face limited legislative and extralegal resistance, and (3) Offering a unique combination of solutions that draws from all corners to best facilitate the growth of cloud technology so as to maximize the positive outcomes listed above and minimize violations of personal privacy rights. We find that depoliticization of cloud technology is desirable whenever possible, and that objective and neutral standards may limit political friction. We argue that the technological infrastructure for cloud computing has outpaced societies' and governments' abilities to respond and therefore seek to speed up the process by which the latter two groups are able to effectively comprehend and regulate the technology that already exists. By addressing g- nuine concerns of privacy violations in the cloud via legal policy, cloud technology will be able to develop more successfully.
机译:云计算为经济效率和个人方便提供了独特的机会。更大数量的设备连接到云,“事情互联网”为数据收集,反馈和积极效果产生了进一步的机会,从更好的消费者经验到环境资源保护。然而,云技术和信息存储越来越多地在各种前沿来消除,以便无法保护消费者权利。黑客事件具有成本丰富的时间和金钱,并通过云内外的政府间谍和监测公民数据,受到隐私权倡导者的批评。来自欧盟向美国和中国的国家对网络安全和网络主导的幌子下的其他市场的动机和行动有争议,致力于侵犯公民隐私的投诉。本文提供了三种中心目的:(1)从三个主要来源识别云技术管理的建议:重点司法管辖区,公司政策和民间社会的立法。 (2)比较这些提案和寻找可能允许在国际性地面临有限的立法和全面抵抗力的云技术的共同理由,以及(3)提供从各个角落的独特组合,以最佳促进云技术的增长所以最大化上面列出的积极结果,并尽量减少违反个人隐私权。我们发现尽可能可取的云技术的去olitic化,目标和中性标准可能限制政治摩擦。我们认为,云计算的技术基础设施已经过分扩大了社会“和政府的能力,从而寻求加快后两组能够有效地理解和规范已经存在的技术的过程。通过法律政策解决云中隐私违规的G-Nuine担忧,云技术将能够更加成功地发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号