首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate >ACTIVE VS PASSIVE SAMPLING OF VOCS IN IAQ FIELD STUDIES IN SELECTED ENERGY-EFFICIENT EUROPEAN OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
【24h】

ACTIVE VS PASSIVE SAMPLING OF VOCS IN IAQ FIELD STUDIES IN SELECTED ENERGY-EFFICIENT EUROPEAN OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

机译:在所选节能欧洲办事处和住宅建筑中的IAQ现场研究中的活跃VS VOCS的被动抽样

获取原文

摘要

In the context of the European research project HOPE (Health Optimization Protocol for Energy-efficient Buildings), the indoor air quality of energy-efficient offices and residential buildings was investigated. Field studies comparing the results ofactive and passive sampling on indoor air quality are scarce. In this HOPE study, both active and passive sampling of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was conducted and the data obtained by four national teams compared. It comes out that, independently of being obtained by active or passive sampling, the trend is quite similar. In some cases the difference between the two methods concerning some compounds, can be explained by the fact that different activities (e.g. cleaning activities, paint work) taking place during the passive sampling period did not coincide with the active sampling time. In a few cases, the sensitivity of the passive method was not sufficient to catch all the compounds detected by the active method. Nevertheless, in general terms, it can be concluded that the use of passive sampling appears to be a good approach to obtain the necessary information on the exposure of people to indoor air.
机译:在欧洲研究项目希望(节能建筑的健康优化议定书)中,研究了节能办公室和住宅建筑的室内空气质量。现场研究比较了室内空气质量上的活性和被动抽样的结果是稀缺的。在这种希望研究中,进行了挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的活性和被动采样,并比较了四支国家队获得的数据。它出现了,独立于主动或被动采样获得,趋势非常相似。在某些情况下,关于一些化合物的两种方法之间的差异可以解释:在被动采样期间发生的不同活动(例如清洁活动,涂料工作)并不与主动采样时间重合。在少数情况下,被动方法的敏感性不足以捕获通过活性方法检测的所有化合物。然而,一般而言,可以得出结论,使用被动采样的使用似乎是获得有关人们暴露于室内空气的必要信息的好方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号