首页> 外文会议>Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference >History Matching: Is it Necessary to Optimize?
【24h】

History Matching: Is it Necessary to Optimize?

机译:历史匹配:是否有必要优化?

获取原文

摘要

The oil industry has recently started to deal with probabilistic approach. Risk or uncertainty analysis have become part of the petroleum engineer's job. A set of curves with the associated probability instead of one deterministic curve is provided by the reservoir engineers. In order to use reliable curves, they shall have a history matched model. Assisted History Matching usually uses optimization processes. The aim of the optimization is to find the minimum of an objective function that represents the quality of the model. In this way, one can find the best model. The keyword is exactly "best". Why to make so much effort to find the best if we know that it is still far from the truth. Indeed, the concept of "best" is not suitable for the probabilistic approach. This work discusses a functional history matching approach where an optimization process is no longer necessary. The functional history matching approach establishes that we have to look for a set of models that is above a level of quality according to the reservoir engineers. The method is quite simple. Among all possible models, we select those that have an objective function value under a pre-defined value. In this approach the discussion lies not in the optimization issues like local minimum, convergence, and rapidity, but in how the quality of the model is measured. The objective function that usually measures the quality must be very well defined. Not only to better take into account the historical data but also to be suitable to the purpose of the study. Infill drilling and new secondary recovery systems would probably require different objective functions. This work discusses the functional history matching approach coupled with uncertainty analysis. Usually very costly in terms of numerical simulations, uncertainty analysis can be done in this approach with simplified models (proxys). Different proxys were used - Surface Response Modeling (improved or not) and Artificial Neural Network. A simple synthetic case (PUNQ), and a real complex case (Brazilian onshore field) were used to illustrate the functional approach.
机译:石油工业最近开始处理概率的方法。风险或不确定性分析已成为石油工程师工作的一部分。储存器工程师提供了一组具有相关概率而不是一个确定性曲线的曲线。为了使用可靠的曲线,它们应具有历史匹配的模型。辅助历史匹配通常使用优化流程。优化的目的是找到代表模型质量的目标函数的最小值。通过这种方式,人们可以找到最好的模型。关键字完全是“最好的”。如果我们知道它仍然远离真相,为什么努力找到最好的努力。实际上,“最佳”的概念不适合概率方法。这项工作讨论了功能历史匹配方法,其中不再需要优化过程。功能历史匹配方法建立了我们必须根据库工程师寻找一组高于质量水平的模型。该方法非常简单。在所有可能的模型中,我们选择在预定义值下具有客观函数值的那些。在这种方法中,讨论不在优化问题,如局部最小,收敛和迅速,但如何测量模型的质量。通常测量质量的目标函数必须非常明确。不仅要更好地考虑到历史数据,还要适合研究的目的。填充钻孔和新的二级恢复系统可能需要不同的客观功能。这项工作讨论了功能历史匹配方法与不确定性分析相结合。通常在数值模拟方面通常非常昂贵,可以通过简化模型(Proxys)以这种方法进行不确定性分析。使用不同的Proxys - 表面响应建模(改进或不)和人工神经网络。使用简单的合成案例(PUNQ)和真正的复杂案例(巴西陆上字段)用于说明功能方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号