首页> 外文会议>International ASTM/ESIS Symposium on Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics >Evaluation of Fatigue Crack Thresholds Using Various Experimental Methods
【24h】

Evaluation of Fatigue Crack Thresholds Using Various Experimental Methods

机译:使用各种实验方法评估疲劳裂缝阈值

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The accurate representation of fatigue crack threshold, the region defining crack growth as either very slow or nonexistent, is extremely important. If the experimentally measured threshold is unconservatively high, a structural component designed with this data may fail long before the fatigue analysis predicts. The fatigue crack growth threshold is experimentally defined using ASTM standard E 647, which has been shown to exhibit anomalies. Alternate test methods have been proposed, such as the constant K_(max) test procedure, to define the threshold regime without ambiguity. However, only the current test method defined by ASTM is designed to produce the range of fatigue crack thresholds (e.g., low and high R) needed to characterize an aerospace loading environment. It is the scope of this paper to determine the fatigue crack growth threshold of a well characterized aerospace alloy, 7075-T7351 aluminum, using different methods, to compare the results, and to draw conclusions.
机译:疲劳裂缝阈值的准确表示,区域限定裂纹生长为非常慢或不存在,非常重要。如果实验测量的阈值是不合理的,则在疲劳分析预测之前,用该数据设计的结构部件可能发生故障。使用ASTM标准E 647实验定义疲劳裂纹生长阈值,该抗ASTM标准E 647已被显示出表现出异常。已经提出了替代测试方法,例如常数K_(MAX)测试过程,以定义阈值制度而不模糊。然而,只有由ASTM定义的当前测试方法被设计为产生特征航空航天装载环境所需的疲劳裂缝阈值(例如,低和高R)的范围。本文的范围是利用不同方法确定井表征航空航天合金,7075-T7351铝的疲劳裂纹生长阈值,以比较结果,并得出结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号