首页> 外文会议>ASIST Annual Meeting >The Cultural Shaping of Scholarly Communication: Explaining E-Journal Use Within and Across Academic Fields
【24h】

The Cultural Shaping of Scholarly Communication: Explaining E-Journal Use Within and Across Academic Fields

机译:学术沟通的文化塑造:解释学术领域内外的电子期刊

获取原文

摘要

Current research on e-joumal usage patterns focuses more on measuring levels of use and measuring changes in reading patterns than developing theoretical models that enable the explanation and prediction of patterns in the adoption and uptake of e-journals across scientific fields. Typically, studies either focus on single disciplines or attempt to reach an overview of disciplinary differences by using broad disciplinary groupings, such as physical sciences, health sciences, applied technologies, social sciences, or humanities. We argue that there is a need for extending the domain analytic approach to incorporate a fuller understanding of the cultural characteristics of scientific specialisms, which include both epistemological and social considerations. To this end we suggest that Whitley's theory of the social organization of scholarly fields can be effectively used as an explanatory model of e-journal use across scientific fields. By using Whitley's theory we also illustrate the limitation of current approaches to the explanation of information practices and e-journal use that use the administrative unit of the discipline, or base comparison on coarse-grained aggregations as the unit of analysis, rather than the specialism.
机译:关于E-Joumal使用模式的目前研究更多地关注测量使用和测量阅读模式的变化,而不是开发在科学领域采用和吸收电子期刊的采用和摄取模式中的解释和预测的理论模型。通常,通过使用广泛的纪律群体,如物理科学,卫生科学,应用技术,社会科学或人文学科,重点研究单一学科或试图概述纪律差异概述。我们认为,需要扩展域分析方法,以融入更全面了解科学专业的文化特征,包括顾虑学和社会考虑因素。为此,我们建议惠特利学术领域的社会组织理论可以有效地用作科学领域的电​​子期刊使用的解释性模型。通过使用Whitley的理论,我们还说明了利用使用本学科行政单位的信息实践和电子期刊使用方法的当前方法的限制,或者基于粗粒聚集的基础比较作为分析单位,而不是专业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号