【24h】

Defending OSHA Facility Siting Citations

机译:捍卫OSHA设施选址引用

获取原文

摘要

Since the Process Safety Management Standard was promulgated, industry has struggled with how to effectively and feasibly comply with the facility siting provision of the Standard. This issue is very complex, and involves various industry guidance documents, good engineering practices, and the exercise of professional judgment. Many facets of the issue are evolving and subject to continuous debate within industry. For example, should qualitative or quantitative risk analysis be used? Should credible or worst case scenarios be used? Should occupancy criteria be 200 or 400 man hours per week? Should control rooms be moved or reinforced? Since the PSM Standard is a performance standard, industry and individual employers have a great deal of discretion in resolving these issues.
机译:由于颁布了工艺安全管理标准,因此行业与如何有效,可靠地遵守该标准的设施选址。这个问题非常复杂,并且涉及各种行业指导文件,良好的工程措施以及专业判断的行使。这个问题的许多方面正在不断发展,并且在行业内不断辩论。例如,应该使用定性或定量风险分析?应该使用可信或最坏的情况吗?应占用标准是否每周200或400小时?控制房间是否应移动或加强?由于PSM标准是绩效标准,行业和个人雇主在解决这些问题方面有很大的自由裁量权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号