【24h】

INDOOR FDD MULTI-OPERATOR DEPLOYMENT

机译:室内FDD多运营商部署

获取原文

摘要

The performance of UTRA-FDD was assessed under multi-operator deployments in an indoor office environment. A modified version of the proposed 3GPP picocell scenario was used, with two deployed operators, each having 5 Base Stations (BS). Two different deployments were investigated: one where the BSs of the different operators were co-located and another where they were not co-located. User terminals (UEs) were uniformly distributed within the office environment. Most terminals generated 12.2 kbps traffic, but a considerable proportion generated 64 kbps, 144 kbps and 384 kbps traffic. Monte-Carlo type simulations were run to collect performance related data. Results from a single operator (Operator A) deployment were used as baseline for comparison purposes. Analysis of the simulation results showed that, on the uplink, there was virtually no significant difference between the two alternative deployments as regards the performance of Operator A. On the downlink, co-located deployment had no significant impact on Operator A, while non co-located deployment compromised the downlink capacity and the coverage of Operator A in the vicinity of Operator B base stations. In addition, Operator B suffered from reduced performance on both uplink and downlink when not co-located with Operator A, due to non ideal positions of its own base stations.
机译:UTRA-FDD在室内办公环境中的多运营商部署下进行了评估。使用了建议的3GPP Picocell方案的修改版本,其中两个部署的运营商,每个运营商都有5个基站(BS)。调查了两种不同的部署:不同运营商的BS的BS也在坐在那里,另一个在他们不共同定位的地方。用户终端(UE)均匀分布在Office环境中。大多数终端产生了12.2 kbps流量,但相当大的比例为64 kbps,144 kbps和384 kbps流量。运行Monte-Carlo型模拟以收集相关数据。单个操作员(运算符A)部署的结果用作比较目的的基线。仿真结果分析显示,在上行链路上,两种替代部署在操作员A的性能方面几乎没有显着差异。在下行链路上,共同定位的部署对操作员A没有显着影响,而非共同 - 分配部署损失了操作者B基站附近的下行链路容量和操作员A的覆盖范围。此外,由于其自​​身基站的非理想位置,操作员B由于不与运营商A共同定位而在上行链路和下行链路上的性能降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号