【24h】

Selling ISO 9000:2000 to the CEO

机译:销售ISO 9000:2000至CEO

获取原文

摘要

As December 15, 2003, the deadline to convert to the ISO 9000: 2000 standards, looms closer, Quality Managers are often finding they are faced with two challenges. First, they must evaluate their current quality systems in preparation for the transition. The second, and often the greater of the two challenges, is convincing top management of the continued benefits of their ISO registration. In the past, many companies seeking registration to the ISO 9000:1994 standard tended to focus on complying with the Standard's requirements, often at the expense of seeing real improvement in the quality of their products or service. As a result, many quality management systems today are structured around the clauses of this standard and, to a greater or lesser extent, consist of sets of procedures and work instructions grouped by company function such as sales, production, distribution or accounts. In the last 5-10 years the more progressive companies have developed their systems in line with quality improvement initiatives such as quality cost measurement systems, customer-supplier initiatives and other quality related activities. While these activities have lead to some improved performance, senior management has often continued to seriously question the value of these systems for improving company performance relative to the cost of maintaining them. This same group continues to view Quality Management as something separate from Business Management. In line with this perception. quality management has failed as a mechanism for meeting their business objectives. The most common themes executive level leaders are expressing are: ·Limited return on investment, ·Excessive documentation which is perceived as inflexible and difficult to access, ·High cost of maintenance, ·Difficult to measure system's effectiveness, ·Little, if any, relevance to customer satisfaction, and ·No contribution to business improvement
机译:截至2003年12月15日,转换为ISO 9000:2000标准的截止日期,较近,质量管理人员往往发现他们面临两个挑战。首先,他们必须评估他们的当前质量系统以准备过渡。第二种,往往是两个挑战中的往往令人信服的是,令人信服地管理其ISO注册的持续福利。在过去,许多公司寻求注册到ISO 9000:1994标准的公司倾向于专注于遵守标准的要求,通常是为了看到其产品质量或服务质量的实际改善。因此,今天的许多质量管理系统都是在本标准的条款周围构建的,并且在更大或更短的程度上,由公司功能组成的程序和工作说明组成,例如销售,生产,分发或账户等。在过去的5 - 10年中,越来越普通的公司符合质量改进举措,如优质成本测量系统,客户 - 供应商举措和其他质量相关活动等质量改进举措。虽然这些活动导致了一些改进的绩效,但高级管理层经常继续严重质疑这些系统的价值,以改善公司业绩相对于维护其成本。同一组继续将质量管理视为与业务管理分开的东西。符合这种看法。质量管理失败是满足其业务目标的机制。行政级别领导人表达的最常见的主题是:·投资回报率有限,·过多的文件被认为是不灵活的,难以获得,·维护成本高,难以测量系统的效率,·小,如果有的话,则难以预测为了客户满意度,·对业务改进没有贡献

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号