首页> 外文会议>Canadian symposium on remote sensing >Forest Classification by Multiple-Forward-Mode 5-Scale Modeling
【24h】

Forest Classification by Multiple-Forward-Mode 5-Scale Modeling

机译:通过多前进模式5级模型进行森林分类

获取原文

摘要

The Multiple-Forward-Mode 5-Scale approach (MFM-5-Scale) has been demonstrated as a new approach for unsupervised cluster labeling and landcover classification. The basis for this is its ability to link powerful models of forest stand structure and radiative transfer with satellite image response patterns to provide a flexible, physically-based, semi-automated classification and biophysical parameter estimation algorithm. In this work, results using MFM-5-Scale are compared with those obtained by the Enhancement Classification Method (ECM), a highly accurate yet subjective and labour intensive approach which involves considerable user judgement and expertise. The goal was to approach ECM accuracy using MFM-5-Scale, but without the subjectivity of ECM. A mosaic of 7 Landsat TM scenes from different years and covering most of the BOREAS region in western Canada was used in this study. Classifications of 12 forest classes including deciduous and species-specific coniferous classes subdivided into low, medium and high crown densities as well as a mixed forest class were evaluated against 136 field checked validation sites. Overall classification accuracies were 91% for ECM and 85% for MFM-5-Scale. Additional assessments of agreement between the MFM-5-Scale and ECM products were also performed over larger sample areas. The two products were in 76% agreement for all 12 classes (n=6000), and were 94% in agreement for a smaller sample of 6 forest density classes (n=3730). These results are viewed as quite positive towards defining an operational approach, given the objective, semi-automated nature of MFM-5-Scale compared to subjective, user-driven methods such as ECM.
机译:已经证明了多前进模式5级方法(MFM-5级)作为无监督群集标签和Landcover分类的新方法。基础是它能够将强大模型的森林立场结构和辐射转移与卫星图像响应模式联系起来,以提供灵活,物理基础的半自动分类和生物物理参数估计算法。在这项工作中,将使用MFM-5级别的结果与通过增强分类方法(ECM)获得的结果进行比较,这是一种高度准确的尚未主观的和劳动密集型方法,涉及相当大的用户判断和专业知识。目标是使用MFM-5级别接近ECM精度,但没有ECM的主观性。在这项研究中使用了来自不同年份的7个Landsat TM场景的Mosaic,并覆盖加拿大西部大部分Boreas地区。 12个森林类别的分类包括落叶和物种特异性针叶类以及细分为低,中和高冠密度以及混合森林类别,针对136个验证的验证网站进行评估。 ECM的整体分类精度为91%,MFM-5级为85%。还在较大的样本区域进行了MFM-5规模和ECM产品之间协议的额外评估。这两种产品适用于所有12级(N = 6000)的76%协议,达94%,达到较小的6个森林密度类别样本(n = 3730)。鉴于MFM-5规模的目标,与ECM等主体用户驱动方法相比,这些结果朝着定义操作方法被视为非常积极的态度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号