首页> 外文会议>IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems >Why is it so hard to predict software system trustworthiness from software component trustworthiness?
【24h】

Why is it so hard to predict software system trustworthiness from software component trustworthiness?

机译:为什么从软件组件可信度中预测软件系统可靠性难以预测?

获取原文

摘要

Much of the work from the past 10 years into Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE) and Component Based Development (CBD) has dealt with Functional Composability (FC). FC is concerned with whether F(A) ξ F(B) = F(A ξ B) is true (where ξ is some mathematical operator), i.e., whether a composite system results that has the desired functionality given that the system is created solely by joining A and B. But increasingly, our community is discovering that FC, even if it were a solved problem (using formal methods, architectural design approaches, model checking, etc.), is still not mature enough for other serious concerns that arise in CBSE and CBD. These concerns stem from the problem of composing "ilities". "Ilities" are non-functional properties of software components and define characteristics such as security, reliability, fault-tolerance, performance, availability, safety, etc.
机译:从过去10年到基于组件的软件工程(CBSE)和基于组件的开发(CBD)的大部分工作都处理了功能性可容纳性(FC)。 FC涉及F(a)ξf(b)= f(a≠b)是否为真(其中ξ是一些数学运算符),即,是否具有所需功能的复合系统结果,该结果是创建系统的所需功能仅仅通过加入A和B.但越来越多地,我们的社区正在发现FC,即使是解决问题(使用正式方法,建筑设计方法,模型检查等),对于其他严重问题来说仍然不够成熟在CBSE和CBD中出现。这些担忧源于构成“幂”的问题。 “动力量”是软件组件的非功能性,并定义安全性,可靠性,容错,性能,可用性,安全等特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号