首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems >Adopting Agile Software Development Combined with User-Centered Design and Lean Startup: A Systematic Literature Review on Maturity Models
【24h】

Adopting Agile Software Development Combined with User-Centered Design and Lean Startup: A Systematic Literature Review on Maturity Models

机译:采用敏捷软件开发与用户以用户为中心的设计和精简启动:对成熟度模型的系统文献综述

获取原文

摘要

The use of Agile in the software development industry in the past two decades revealed that it is lackluster in some aspects, such as in guaranteeing user involvement and assuring that the right software is being built. There are reports that combining Agile with Lean Startup and User-Centered Design (UCD) helps in overcoming these shortcomings while also yielding several other benefits. However, there is not much documentation on how to use this "combined approach" and adapting existing organizations to use it is a challenge in of itself, in which the use of an instrument to guide or assess such transformations is typically pivotal to their success. As such, in this paper we seek to identify maturity models that assess the use of Agile, Lean Startup, and UCD. We conducted a systematic literature review of maturity models for these three methods published between 2001 and 2020. We characterized the maturity models and determined how they see maturity, how they are applied, and how they were evaluated. As an extended version of a previous paper, we augmented our analysis criteria and further classified the models in how they interpret maturity and what strategy they suggest when undergoing an improvement process, in addition to providing new insight on various aspects of the models. We found 35 maturity models, of which 23 were for Agile, 5 for Lean thinking, 5 for UCD, and 2 for Agile and UCD combined. No models for the combination of the three methods were found (nor for Lean Startup), as expected due to the novelty of the approach. Existing models mostly focus on practice adoption and acquiring continuous improvement capabilities, and are typically developed with a specific context in mind. We also note a lack of proper evaluation procedures being conducted on the majority of models, which could be due to the lack of well-established maturity model development methods and guidelines.
机译:在过去二十年中,在软件开发行业中使用敏捷在某些方面存在巨大巨大,例如保证用户参与并确保正在建立合适的软件。有报道,将敏捷与精简启动和用户中心设计(UCD)组合有助于克服这些缺点,同时也产生了其他几个好处。但是,没有多少关于如何使用这种“组合方法”并调整现有组织使用的文件,这本身就是一种挑战,其中使用仪器来指导或评估这种转变的成功通常是关键的。因此,在本文中,我们寻求识别评估敏捷,精益启动和UCD的使用的成熟模型。我们对2001年至2020年之间发布的这三种方法进行了系统的文献综述。我们以成熟度模型为特征,并确定了他们如何看到成熟,如何应用程序,以及如何评估它们。作为前一篇论文的扩展版本,我们增强了分析标准,并进一步分类了它们在如何解释成熟度以及在进行改进过程时如何解释成熟度以及他们建议的策略,以及在为模型的各个方面提供新的洞察。我们找到了35个成熟模型,其中23个适用于敏捷,5,用于精益思维,5个用于UCD,2个用于敏捷和UCD。没有找到三种方法组合的模型(也没有用于精益启动),因为该方法的新颖性是预期的。现有型号主要专注于实践采用和获取持续改进能力,通常与特定的背景制定。我们还注意到缺乏对大多数模型进行的适当评估程序,这可能是由于缺乏良好的成熟度模型开发方法和指导方针。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号