首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society >ALPHABETIC VS. QWERTY KEYBOARD LAYOUTS FOR TOUCH SCREENS: HASN'T SOMEONE ALREADY DONE THAT?
【24h】

ALPHABETIC VS. QWERTY KEYBOARD LAYOUTS FOR TOUCH SCREENS: HASN'T SOMEONE ALREADY DONE THAT?

机译:alphabetic vs.触摸屏的QWERTY键盘布局:没有人已经这样做了吗?

获取原文

摘要

Forty-eight subjects (24 experienced and 24 inexperienced) entered name and address data on three types ofkeyboard layouts, the standard QWERTY, an alphabetic, and a random layout (as a control condition).Each keyboard was used in a squared arrangement where the keys were arranged in perfectly aligned rowsand columns, and an offset version, where for every other row, the columns were slightly offset. The datashow both preference and performance advantages for the QWERTY arrangement. Recommendations fordesign are discussed
机译:四十八个科目(24次经验丰富的24个营业的)输入的名称和地址数据在三种类型的键盘布局,标准qwerty,字母和随机布局(作为控制条件).Ece键盘以平方排列使用键在完美对齐的rowsand列中排列,以及偏移版本,其中每个其他行,列略微偏移。 QWERTY安排的偏好和性能优势。讨论了建议书

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号