首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society >USING 2-D VS. 3-D DISPLAYS: GESTALT AND PRECISION TASKS
【24h】

USING 2-D VS. 3-D DISPLAYS: GESTALT AND PRECISION TASKS

机译:使用2-D与3-D显示:GESTALT和精确任务

获取原文

摘要

Research on when and how to use three-dimensional (3-D) perspective views on flat screens for operational tasks such as air traffic control is confusing and contradictory. We stepped back to consider the basic qualities and capabilities oftwo-dimensional (2-D) and 3-D views. In two experiments, we tested the hypothesis that 3-D views are better for shape understanding and 2-D views are better for precisely judging relative positions. Participants viewed simple block shapes in 2-D or 3-Dand either performed a shape understanding task (e.g. identification, mental rotation) or a relative position task (e.g. directions and distances between objects). Results confirmed the hypothesis.
机译:关于空中交通管制等操作任务的平面屏幕上使用三维(3-D)透视图的研究何时以及如何使用三维(3-D)透视图令人困惑和矛盾。我们退后一步考虑Ow-Dimensional(2-D)和3-D视图的基本素质和功能。在两个实验中,我们测试了一个假设,即3-D视图更好地用于形状理解,2-D视图更好地精确地判断相对位置。参与者在2-D或3-adk中观看了简单的块形状,无论是执行形状理解任务(例如识别,心理旋转)或相对位置任务(例如,对象之间的方向和距离)。结果证实了假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号