首页> 外文会议>Annual precise time and time interval systems and applications meeting >Frequency transfer using GPS: a comparative study of code and carrier phase analysis results
【24h】

Frequency transfer using GPS: a comparative study of code and carrier phase analysis results

机译:使用GPS的频率传递:代码和载波相分析结果的比较研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper investigates the use of GPS codes and carrier phases for frequency transfer applications. Three types of baselines have been studied. First, the noise of the code and phase methods has been evaluated using a zero-baseline with two geodetic GPS receivers driven by the same H-Maser clock, or by a cesium and an H-Maser clock respectively. From the common frequency reference we were able to derive a frequency stability of 6.10~(-16) for averaging times of one day. The different response of the hardware of the two receivers to small identical temperature variations is emplasized; the differential effect is about 30 ps/deg C. The difference between the L1 and L2 carrier phase delays is shown too. Secondly, on-site tests over a 95-m baseline allowed checking the influence of combining two antennae/receivers in different environments. In this case, the effect of the varying temperature on the hardware delays of the receivers and cables is shown; this effect limits the frequency stability to 6.10~(-15) for an averaging time of one day. The possibility to obtain frequency stabilities of a few parts in 10~(16) is shown; this can be reached if all the instruments are located in temperature-stabilized rooms. Finally, the frequency stability obtained with different code methods is compared on a longer baseline (640 km) between Brussels and Wettzell. In particular, the influence of using IGS satellite ephemerides instead of broadcast ephemerides is shown to be very small. The "all-in-view" methods based on the code, as well as on the carrier phases, are compared to the classic frequency transfer by common view. Preliminary results, using carrier phases, lead to a frequency stability of a few parts in 10~(15) for averaging times of one day. Again, the main limitations are the hardware delay variations due to the changes in ambient conditions.
机译:本文调查了GPS码和载波阶段的频率传输应用的应用。已经研究了三种类型的基线。首先,已经使用零基线评估代码和阶段方法的噪声,其具有由相同的H-MASER时钟的两个大地测量GPS接收器,或分别由铯和H-MASER时钟。从常见的频率参考,我们能够导出6.10〜(-16)的频率稳定性,以便平均一天的时间。将两个接收器的硬件的不同响应升至小相同的温度变化;差异效果约为30 ps / deg c. L1和L2载波相位延迟之间的差异也显示为。其次,在95米基线上的现场测试允许检查组合两个天线/接收器在不同环境中的影响。在这种情况下,示出了不同温度对接收器和电缆的硬件延迟的影响;该效果将频率稳定性限制为6.10〜(-15)的平均时间。显示10〜(16)中几个部分获得频率稳定性的可能性;如果所有仪器位于温度稳定的房间内,可以达到这一点。最后,在布鲁塞尔和Wettzell之间的较长基线(640km)上比较了用不同代码方法获得的频率稳定性。特别地,示出了使用IGS卫星单杂种代替播放间歇委员会的影响非常小。基于代码以及载波阶段的“vide视图”方法与公共视图的经典频率传输进行比较。使用载体阶段的初步结果导致10〜(15)的频率稳定性,以平均一天的时间。同样,主要限制是由于环境条件的变化导致的硬件延迟变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号