首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines >The impact of numerical schemes on flow separation capturing of a linear compressor cascade using DES method
【24h】

The impact of numerical schemes on flow separation capturing of a linear compressor cascade using DES method

机译:数值方案对使用DES方法的线性压缩机级联的流分离捕获的影响

获取原文

摘要

Detached Eddy Simulation (DES) has been considered as a promising simulation method to calculate the massive flow separation, while the impact of numerical schemes on flow separation capturing using DES method in internal flow field is still unresolved. The investigation is conducted using DES method based on Spalart-Allmaras model. Three different numerical schemes for convection term have been tested, which are upwind schemes, including 1st order and 2nd order scheme based on Roe scheme, and 2nd central scheme with low artificial viscosity. Three-dimensional corner separation flow field of a linear compressor cascade is diagnosed under high incidence condition. Besides, the pressure-sensitive paint experimental result is used as a standard for numerical simulation accuracy evaluation. We detailly discussed the time-averaged and instantaneous flow filed, and the results show that: 1) the DES method using the central scheme is more accurate than the results of the upwind scheme in term of corner separation prediction; 2) The complex vortex structures in the corner region are mainly from three parts, i.e. corner separation, end-wall separation and suction surface separation. Although the results of two schemes capture the same vortex structures, the causes of the generation and the positions of the vortices are totally different; 3) The vortex fluctuation frequencies and intensities predicted by 2nd upwind scheme and 2nd central scheme are different, but they all shows the same relationship.
机译:分离的涡流模拟(DES)被认为是计算大量流动分离的有希望的模拟方法,而数值方案在内部流场中使用DES方法的流分离捕获的影响仍未得到解决。使用基于Spalart-Allmaras模型的DES方法进行调查。已经测试了用于对流术语的三种不同数值方案,其是基于ROE方案的第一顺序和第二阶规划,以及具有低人工粘度的第二中心方案。线性压缩机级联的三维角分离流场在高发生率下诊断。此外,压敏涂料实验结果用作数值模拟精度评价的标准。我们详细讨论了提交的时间平均和瞬时流量,结果表明:1)使用中央方案的DES方法比角分离预测期限的上冲程方案的结果更准确; 2)角部区域的复杂涡旋结构主要来自三个部分,即角分离,末端壁分离和抽吸表面分离。虽然两种方案的结果捕获相同的涡流结构,但生成的原因和涡流的位置完全不同; 3)第2个Upwind方案和第2个中央方案预测的涡流波动频率和强度不同,但它们都显示了相同的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号