首页> 外文会议>International Pipeline Conference >PIPELINE GEOHAZARD ASSESSMENT - BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY CONTEXTS
【24h】

PIPELINE GEOHAZARD ASSESSMENT - BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY CONTEXTS

机译:管道地质曲线评估 - 弥合完整性管理与施工安全背景之间的差距

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Geohazards are threats of a geological, geotechnical, hydrological, or seismic/tectonic nature that may negatively affect people, infrastructure and/or the environment. In a pipeline integrity management context, geohazards are considered under the time-independent threat category of Weather-related and Outside Force in the American standard ASME B31.8S. Geotechnical failure of pipelines due to ground movement is addressed in Annex H and elsewhere in the Canadian standard CSA-Z662. Both of these standards allow flexibility in terms of geohazard assessment as part of pipeline integrity management. As a result of this flexibility, many systems for identifying, characterizing, analyzing and managing geohazards have been developed by operators and geotechnical engineering practitioners. The evolution of these systems, and general expectations regarding geohazard assessment, toward quantitative geohazard frequency assessment is a trend in recent pipeline hearings and regulatory filings in Canada. While this trend is intended to frame geohazard assessment in an objective and repeatable manner, partitioning the assessment into a series of conditional probability estimates, the reality is that there is always an element of subjectivity in assigning these conditional probabilities, requiring subject matter expertise and expert judgment to make informed and defensible decisions. Defining a specific risk context (typically loss of containment from a pipeline) and communicating uncertainty are important aspects of applying these types of systems. Adoption of these approaches for alternate risk contexts, such as worker safety during pipeline construction, is challenging in that the specific geohazards and threat scenarios considered for long-term pipeline integrity may or may not adequately represent all credible threats during pipeline construction. This paper explores the commonalities and differences in short- and long-term framing of geohazard assessment, and offers guidance for extending geohazard assessment for long-term pipeline integrity to other contexts such as construction safety.
机译:地质蹂躏是对人,基础设施和/或环境产生负面影响的地质,岩土,水文或地震/构造性质的威胁。在管道完整性管理环境中,在美国标准ASME B31.8S中的天气相关和外部武力的时间无关威胁类别下考虑了地质蹂躏。在加拿大标准CSA-Z662的附件H和其他地方,解决了由于地面运动引起的管道的岩土失败。这两项标准都允许在地质血清评估方面灵活,作为管道完整性管理的一部分。由于这种灵活性,运营商和岩土工程师从业公司开发了许多用于识别,表征,分析和管理地质曲集型的系统。这些系统的演变和关于地质曲集型评估的一般期望,朝向定量地质曲线频率评估是近期管道听证会和加拿大监管申请的趋势。虽然这一趋势旨在以客观和可重复的方式框架地质曲集型评估,但将评估分配到一系列条件概率估计中,但现实情况是在分配这些条件概率方面存在主体性的元素,需要主题专业知识和专家判断明智和可辩护的决定。定义特定风险上下文(通常从管道丢失)并传达不确定性是应用这些类型系统的重要方面。采用这些方法的替代风险背景,例如在管道建设期间的工人安全性,这是具有挑战性的,因为考虑了用于长期管道完整性的特定地质血清和威胁情景可能或可能无法充分代表管道建设期间的所有可信威胁。本文探讨了地质血清评估的短期和长期框架的共同点和差异,并为长期管道完整扩展了地质血清评估的指导,以施工安全等其他环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号