首页> 外文会议>Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences >Group Bundling Versus Traditional Bundling in e-Commerce: A Field Experiment
【24h】

Group Bundling Versus Traditional Bundling in e-Commerce: A Field Experiment

机译:集团捆绑与传统捆绑在电子商务中:一个现场实验

获取原文

摘要

Selling in bundles has been argued to lead to more and earlier sales in promotion and clearance campaigns, which could improve inventory turnover, capacity utilization, and profitability. However, recent findings suggest that bundle promotions have limited ability in achieving such outcomes because of the quantity requirement in traditional bundling (purchasing a quantity of two or more for consumers to qualify for the bundle discount), which deter non-buyers to become buyers. A recently proposed method (group bundling) promises to alleviate the quantity requirement while maintaining the bundling benefits both to consumers (discounts) and to retailers (minimum sales volume). However, there has been neither theoretical explanation nor empirical validation of the method's advantage/disadvantage, a gap that this paper fills. The results of a field experiment we conducted on the e-commerce operation of a gym suggests that group bundling does have a relative advantage in driving consumers' intention to buy online bundles.
机译:已争辩销售促销促销和清关运动销售,可提高库存营业额,产能利用率和盈利能力。然而,最近的调查结果表明,由于传统捆绑的数量要求(为消费者购买两种以上,为消费者购买捆绑折扣),这使得不适合非买家成为买家的数量要求,捆绑促销能力有限。最近提出的方法(集团捆绑)承诺减轻数量要求,同时保持消费者(折扣)和零售商(最低销售额)的捆绑益处。然而,既不是理论解释也没有对该方法的优势/缺点的经验验证,这篇论文填补的间隙。我们在健身房的电子商务运营中进行的现场实验结果表明,集团捆绑在驾驶消费者打算在线捆绑的意图具有相对优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号