首页> 外文会议>World Environmental and Water Resources Congress >Two California Dams: A Comparison of M. M. O'Shaughnessy's Hetch Hetchy Dam and William Mulholland's St. Francis Dam
【24h】

Two California Dams: A Comparison of M. M. O'Shaughnessy's Hetch Hetchy Dam and William Mulholland's St. Francis Dam

机译:两个加利福尼亚水坝:M. M. O'Shaughnessy的Hetch Hetchy Dam和William Mulholland的St. Francis Dam的比较

获取原文

摘要

In the 1920s San Francisco and Los Angeles reigned as California's premier cities. During the 1920s both built major concrete curved gravity dams, massive structures that helped symbolize the growing importance of their respective urban centers. But the fate of these two dams was quite different: San Francisco's O'Shaughnessy Dam remains today a vital component of the Bay Area's municipal water supply system, while Los Angeles' St. Francis Dam catastrophically failed on March 12, 1928, killing some 400 people. This paper illustrates how the two dams differed in their design-especially in regard to uplift-and also notes how an exemption included in California's 1917 dam safety, allowed engineers M. M. O'Shaughnessy (for San Francisco) and William Mulholland (for Los Angeles) the freedom to build them without any review or approval by the State Engineer or other state authorities.
机译:在20世纪20年代旧金山和洛杉矶统治着加州的总理城市。在20世纪20年代,两个建造了主要的混凝土弯曲重力坝,大规模结构,有助于象征各自城市中心的越来越重要。但这两个水坝的命运是完全不同的:旧金山的奥卡赫·坝仍然是湾区市政供水系统的重要组成部分,而洛杉矶的圣弗朗西斯大坝在1928年3月12日灾难性失败,造成400名400人们。本文说明了两座大坝在其设计中有何不同 - 特别是在提升 - 以及如何在加利福尼亚1917年的大坝安全中豁免,允许工程师MM O'Shaughnery(旧金山)和William Mulholland(洛杉矶)在没有任何审查或批准的国家工程师或其他国家当局的自由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号