首页> 外文会议>Conference on Structures Under Shock and Impact >PROPOSAL FOR MODIFYING THE EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS OF SOIL DISPLACEMENT FOR GROUND SHOCK FROM BURIED EXPLOSIONS
【24h】

PROPOSAL FOR MODIFYING THE EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS OF SOIL DISPLACEMENT FOR GROUND SHOCK FROM BURIED EXPLOSIONS

机译:从埋地爆炸修改土壤位移的经验方程的提案

获取原文

摘要

This paper studies the empirical equations for predicting soil displacement from ground shock generated by buried or ground penetrating explosive charges. These equations were derived in the 1980s by Drake et al. (1983/1989) and then used in the conventional weapon loads software, TM 5-855-1, developed by US Army Research Engineers. AUTODYN simulations with a one-dimensional finite element wedge were conducted using a multi-material Euler formulation. Different sizes of explosive charges were simulated and the maximum soil displacement in dry sand was studied at different scaled distances Z. When comparing the results from AUTODYN simulations and empirical calculations on maximum soil displacement for charges varying from 0.125 kg to 512 kg in TNT weight and scaled distance Z for each charge from 0.1 to 17 m/kg~(1/3), AUTODYN simulations indicate that the empirical equations are conservative. Here, the soil model for dry sand from Sjoebo was used in the AUTODYN simulations and compared with dry sand parameters in empirical calculations. The Sjoebo sand's mechanical properties, including the equation of state (EOS), have been characterized from tri-axial tests performed by Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) in 2000. When comparing the results in a log-log plot, with axes representing scaled distance and maximum soil displacement, it is seen that the results differ consistently. A proposal is made for scaled distances larger than 1 m/kg~(1/3) of how the empirical equation for maximum displacement proposed by Drake et al. in 1989 can be modified with a modified scaling factor to receive a better fit with AUTODYN. For smaller scaled distance of less than 0.2 m/kg~(1/3), the AUTODYN simulations show a saturation shape in the log-log plot. To receive an improved fit with the otherwise straight lines (one line for each charge size), which the original empirical equation was designed with, it is proposed to introduce an exponential factor that saturates the maximum displacements towards a smaller Z.
机译:本文研究了通过埋地或地面渗透爆炸性收费产生的地面冲击来预测土壤位移的经验方程。这些方程在德雷克等人的20世纪80年代中得出。 (1983/1989)然后在传统的武器装载软件中使用,由美国陆军研究工程师开发的TM 5-855-1。使用多材料欧拉配方进行具有一维有限元楔的Autodyn模拟。模拟了不同大小的爆炸性电荷,并在不同缩放距离Z时研究了干砂中的最大土壤位移。当比较自身造型模拟的结果和对最大土壤位移的结果,在TNT重量中为512 kg为512 kg的电荷。每个电荷的缩放距离z从0.1到17 m / kg〜(1/3),Autodyn模拟表明经验方程是保守的。这里,Sjoebo的干砂土壤模型用于自动覆盖模拟,并与经验计算中的干砂参数相比。该Sjoebo砂的机械性能,包括状态(EOS)的方程,已经表征了来自三轴测试在2000年进行的由挪威土工研究所(NGI)进行比较时在log-log图的结果,与表示缩放距离轴和最大的土壤位移,看来结果始终如一。提出的距离距离大于1米/千克(1/3)的德雷克等人提出的最大位移的经验方程。在1989年,可以用修改的缩放因子进行修改,以便使用AutodyN更好地拟合。对于小于0.2 m / kg〜(1/3)的较小缩放距离,Autodyn模拟显示了日志记录图中的饱和形状。为了接收改进的配合,用另外的直线(每个充电尺寸的一条线),建议提出原始经验方程式的原始经验方程,引入指数系数,使最大位移达到较小的Z.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号