首页> 外文会议>IEEE Power and Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference >Dynamic analysis of OLTC and voltage regulator under active network management considering different load profiles
【24h】

Dynamic analysis of OLTC and voltage regulator under active network management considering different load profiles

机译:考虑不同负载曲线的有源网络管理下OLTC和稳压器的动态分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper provides a comparative study of coordinated voltage control (CVC) strategies for on-load tap-changers (OLTCs) and voltage regulator (VRs) under active and passive network management schemes (ANM and PNM). In PNM scheme, OLTC and VR are restricted to only regulate the secondary bus voltages at fixed set-points, while in ANM scheme, control of the secondary bus voltages within the statutory voltage range is allowed, thus providing area-based voltage controls. In this paper, the dynamic model of a 33kV 16-bus United Kingdom generic distribution system (UKGDS) is firstly implemented in PSCAD/EMTDC and validated with a steady-state model, using optimal power flow (OPF)-based technique, developed in GAMS software. Secondly, the OLTC and VR controls under ANM and PNM schemes are developed with discrete tap-changers, and tested considering different load profiles and dynamic loads. The results show that the ANM scheme allows considerable utilization of OLTC and VR compared to PNM scheme, but also may increase the loading of these devices depending on load levels and voltage profile in the power network.
机译:本文对有源和无源网络管理方案(ANM和PNM)下的有载分接开关(OLTC)和调压器(VR)的协调电压控制(CVC)策略进行了比较研究。在PNM方案中,OLTC和VR被限制为仅在固定设定点上调节次级总线电压,而在ANM方案中,允许将次级总线电压控制在法定电压范围内,从而提供基于区域的电压控制。本文首先在PSCAD / EMTDC中实现了33kV 16总线英国通用配电系统(UKGDS)的动态模型,并使用基于最优潮流(OPF)的技术通过稳态模型对其进行了验证,并在此基础上开发了该模型。 GAMS软件。其次,ANM和PNM方案下的OLTC和VR控件是使用分立的分接开关开发的,并在考虑了不同的负载曲线和动态负载的情况下进行了测试。结果表明,与PNM方案相比,ANM方案允许OLTC和VR的大量利用,但根据电力网络中的负载水平和电压曲线,也可能增加这些设备的负载。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号