【24h】

Performance comparison of routing algorithms in packet switchednetworks

机译:分组交换中路由算法的性能比较网路

获取原文

摘要

The algorithms are (1) the CODEX algorithm, (2) Gallager'sdistributed algorithm (1977), and (3) the well-known ARPANET algorithm.The essential characteristics and critical issues in these algorithmsare identified through experimentation under a variety of traffic andnetwork operating conditions. The sensitivity of the mean delayperformance of the algorithms to operating parameters, such as therouting update period and the traffic adjustment parameters, areexamined. The comparison of mean delay behavior indicates that understationary traffic conditions, gradient-based algorithms, such asGallager's algorithm, outperform the other algorithms, whereas the CODEXalgorithm, which is a shortest-path-based virtual circuit routingalgorithm, does better in quasistatic traffic conditions. The ARPANETalgorithm performs poorly, compared to the above two algorithms undermoderate to heavy loading conditions. Some of the factors which could becontributing to the poor performance of the ARPANET algorithm areexamined
机译:算法是(1)Codex算法,(2)Gallager's 分布式算法(1977),和(3)众所周知的ARPANET算法。 这些算法中的基本特征和关键问题 通过各种交通下的实验确定 网络运行条件。平均延迟的敏感性 算法对操作参数的性能,例如 路由更新期间和流量调整参数 检查。平均延迟行为的比较表明在下面 静止的交通状况,基于梯度的算法,如 Gallager的算法,胜过其他算法,而食盒 算法,这是基于最短路径的虚拟电路路由 算法,在Quasistatic交通状况方面更好。 ARPANET. 与上述两种算法相比,算法表现不佳 中度至重载条件。一些可能的因素 有助于arpanet算法的性能不佳 检查

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号