首页> 外文会议>NASTT's No-Dig Show Conference;North American Society for Trenchless Technology >Great Hill Tunnel Rehabilitation: A Comparison of ROV and Manned Inspections of a 1927 Water Tunnel
【24h】

Great Hill Tunnel Rehabilitation: A Comparison of ROV and Manned Inspections of a 1927 Water Tunnel

机译:大山隧道修复:ROV和1927年水隧道的人工检查比较

获取原文

摘要

The Great Hill Tunnel (GHT) is owned and operated by the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority (RWA). It is a 100 MGD, 3,600-foot-long, 6-foot horseshoe-shaped raw water transmission tunnel that cannot be taken out of service and dewatered without installation of a bypass system. After completion of the tunnel in 1927, the first documented inspection was by divers in 1973. Subsequently over the past seven years, the tunnel was inspected by remote operated vehicle (ROV) three times, most recently in the fall of 2017.During the 2017 inspection, routine leakage from the tunnel was noted to have increased dramatically. The owner became concerned that known defects observed during the ROV inspections—including a large defect at the transition from the tunnel to a 48-inch-diameter cast iron pipe—were not only getting larger, but also that the increased leakage was a sign of impending failure of the system. Therefore, an emergency manned inspection and repair program was planned based on the information from the three ROV inspections. This manned inspection and rehabilitation work was completed in the spring of 2018. Regular inspection of water infrastructure, especially manned, is often challenging because of lack of redundancy, limited shutdown windows, or aging infrastructure that could be compromised by dewatering. ROV inspections can alleviate some of these issues but do have limitations. This paper will compare the differences between ROV and manned inspection results and how such results can be applied to tunnel rehabilitation.
机译:大山隧道(GHT)由康涅狄格州中南部地区水务局(RWA)拥有和运营。这是一条100 MGD,长3,600英尺,6英尺的马蹄形原水输送隧道,如果不安装旁路系统就无法停运和脱水。在1927年完成隧道施工后,1973年潜水员进行了第一次有据可查的检查。在随后的七年中,该隧道通过遥控车(ROV)进行了三次检查,最近一次是在2017年秋天。 在2017年的检查中,隧道的例行泄漏已显着增加。业主担心在ROV检查期间观察到的已知缺陷(包括从隧道到直径为48英寸的铸铁管的过渡过程中的较大缺陷)不仅变得越来越大,而且泄漏量的增加也表明了这种缺陷的迹象。即将发生的系统故障。因此,根据来自三个ROV检查的信息,计划了一项紧急有人检查和维修计划。这项有人值守的检查和修复工作已于2018年春季完成。由于缺乏冗余,有限的关闭窗口或老化的基础设施(可能因脱水而受损),对水基础设施(尤其是有人值守)的常规检查通常具有挑战性。 ROV检查可以缓解其中的一些问题,但是确实有局限性。本文将比较ROV和载人检查结果之间的差异,以及如何将这些结果应用于隧道修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号