首页> 外文会议>Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers;SPIE Medical Imaging Conference >An enhanced hybrid MRI thermometry technique for monitoring microwave thermal therapy
【24h】

An enhanced hybrid MRI thermometry technique for monitoring microwave thermal therapy

机译:用于监测微波热疗的增强型混合MRI测温技术

获取原文

摘要

The proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS) method is the most frequently used method to perform volumetricthermometry during MRI-guided thermal therapies. However, one of the main drawbacks of the PRFS methodis its sensitivity to inter-frame motion and magnetic field drifts, which can result in incorrect estimation of temperatureprofiles. To address these problems, several techniques have been proposed, such as the referenceless,multi-baseline, and hybrid methods. While the hybrid method has demonstrated the best performance, it assumesfocal heating, which may be valid when using energy modalities such as high intensity focused ultrasound,but does not hold for heating using diffuse sources such as needle- and catheter-based microwave applicators.Here, we present an enhanced hybrid method suitable for MRI thermometry in the presence of motion duringmicrowave thermal therapy. The presented model-based method uses the sparsity of wavelet coefficients of thephase shift based on the fact that heat-induced phase shifts exhibit a correlation structure due to smoothness.The presented enhanced hybrid method is compared to the previously presented hybrid and conventional PRFSmethods for temperature estimation during microwave heating of a tissue-mimicking phantom with a 2.45 GHzdirectional microwave antenna integrated with 14.1 T high-field MRI. Experimental results demonstrate thatthe proposed method estimates microwave heating-induced temperature changes within 0.3-0.5 °C (mean errorof 5.9 % over 5 min of heating) of fiber-optic temperature sensors, compared to 1.5 °C (mean error of 36.3% over5 min of heating) with the hybrid technique.
机译:质子谐振频率偏移(PRFS)方法是最常用的方法来执行体积 MRI引导热疗法期间的温度测量。但是,PRFS方法的主要缺点之一 它对帧间运动和磁场漂移的敏感性,这可能导致温度估计不正确 配置文件。为了解决这些问题,已经提出了几种技术,例如推荐, 多基线和混合方法。虽然混合方法已经证明了最佳性能,但它假设 焦点加热,在使用高强度聚焦超声的能量模态时可能有效, 但是不使用基于针和导管的微波涂布器等漫射源来加热。 在这里,我们提出了一种增强的混合方法,适用于运动期间存在的MRI温度 微波热疗。呈现的基于模型的方法使用小波系数的稀疏性 相移基于:由于光滑度引起的热诱导相移表现出相关结构。 将呈现的增强的混合方法与先前呈现的杂交和传统PRF进行了比较 用2.45GHz微波加热微波加热温度估计方法 定向微波天线与14.1 T高场MRI集成。实验结果表明 所提出的方法估计微波加热诱导的温度在0.3-0.5℃内变化(平均误差 纤维 - 光学温度传感器的5.9%超过5分钟),而光纤温度传感器相比为1.5°C(平均误差为36.3% 5分钟的加热)用混合技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号