首页> 外文会议>Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2000. Proceedi gs. Annual >Use of fault tree analysis for evaluation of system-reliabilityimprovements in design phase
【24h】

Use of fault tree analysis for evaluation of system-reliabilityimprovements in design phase

机译:使用故障树分析评估系统可靠性设计阶段的改进

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Traditional failure mode and effects analysis is applied as abottom-up analytical technique to identify component failure modes andtheir causes and effects on the system performance, estimate theirlikelihood, severity and criticality or priority for mitigation. Failuremodes and their causes, other than those associated with hardware,primarily electronic, remained poorly addressed or not addressed at all.Likelihood of occurrence was determined on the basis of componentfailure rates or by applying engineering judgement in their estimation.Resultant prioritization is consequently difficult so that only theapparent safety-related or highly critical issues were addressed. Whenthoroughly done, traditional FMEA or FMECA were too involved to be usedas a effective tool for reliability improvement of the product design.Fault tree analysis applied to the product as a top down in view of itsfunctionality, failure definition, architecture and stress andoperational profiles provides a methodical way of following productsfunctional flow down to the low level assemblies, components, failuremodes and respective causes and their combination. Flexibility ofmodeling of various functional conditions and interaction such asenabling events, events with specific priority of occurrence, etc.,using FTA, provides for accurate representation of their functionalityinterdependence. In addition to being capable of accounting for mixedreliability attributes (failure rates mixed with failure probabilities),fault trees are easy to construct and change for quick tradeoffs as rollup of unreliability values is automatic for instant evaluation of thefinal quantitative reliability results. Failure mode analysis usingfault tree technique that is described in this paper allows for real,in-depth engineering evaluation of each individual cause of a failuremode regarding software and hardware components, their functions,stresses, operability and interactions
机译:传统的故障模式和影响分析被应用为 自下而上的分析技术,以识别组件的故障模式和 它们对系统性能的因果关系,估计它们 缓解的可能性,严重性和严重性或优先级。失败 模式及其原因(与硬件相关联的原因除外), 主要是电子的,仍然没有解决或根本没有解决。 发生的可能性是根据组成部分确定的 故障率或通过在估计中应用工程判断。 因此,难以确定结果的优先顺序,因此只有 解决了明显的与安全相关或非常关键的问题。什么时候 彻底完成后,传统的FMEA或FMECA太累而无法使用 作为提高产品设计可靠性的有效工具。 鉴于其产品,自上而下地将故障树分析应用于产品 功能,故障定义,架构和压力以及 操作配置文件提供了一种有条理地跟踪产品的方式 功能流程一直到底层组件,组件,故障 模式及其各自的原因及其组合。的灵活性 各种功能条件和交互的建模,例如 启用事件,具有特定优先级的事件等, 使用FTA,可以准确表示其功能 相互依存。除了能够解释混合 可靠性属性(故障率与故障概率混合), 故障树易于构建和更改,可在滚动时快速权衡 不可靠值的自动评估可自动评估 最终的定量可靠性结果。失效模式分析使用 本文介绍的故障树技术可以实现真实的, 每个失败原因的深入工程评估 模式有关软件和硬件组件,其功能, 压力,可操作性和互动

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号