首页> 外文会议>Air and Waste Management Association annual conference and exhibition >Evaluation of Epifluorescence Methods for Quantifying Bioaerosol in Air Quality Samples
【24h】

Evaluation of Epifluorescence Methods for Quantifying Bioaerosol in Air Quality Samples

机译:评价用于定量分析空气质量样品中生物气溶胶的落射荧光方法

获取原文

摘要

Currently U.S. EPA are enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to regulate the annual and 24-hour average concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 in the air. Both PM2.5 and PM10 contain multiple components from multiple sources. Primary biological aerosol particles (PBAP) is an important component of PM, but there is limited knowledge about how PBAP contributes to PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. There is also a lack in research about the incidence and prevalence of diseases related to PBAP exposure. The main barrier to assess PBAP concentrations and health-related effects is the absence of efficient methodology for quantifying PBAP or its surrogate. Fluorescence methods have been used to quantify bioaerosol containing fluorophores in PM samples, but the long turnaround time and uncharacterized performance limited its applications. This study evaluates different protocols for quantifying PBAP in PM2.5 and PM10 collected on polycarbonate filters using an epifluorescence microscope. PBAP was stained with DNA markers directly on filter (direct-stain) or after they had been washed off from the fitter (extract-stain), followed by a series of fixation, microscopic imaging, and automated particle counting. The methods were first validated using reference samples prepared by depositing known concentrations of E. coli or Aspergillus fumigatus spore on blank polycarbonate fitters. It was found that the direct-stain method required the least sample preparation while achieving a linear response over two orders of magnitude (r2 = 0.9) for PBAP > 0.3-μm diameter and a counting accuracy within ±25% when particle concentrations are >10 times the detection limit. The linear relationship held for PM-preloaded samples, showing the feasibility of measuring PBAP associated with ambient PM. During a two-month monitoring campaign at Las Vegas, Nevada in spring 2017, PBAP concentrations in PM10 ranged from 0.1 to 1.5 #cm-3 while 38% of PBAP were attributed to coarse particles between 2.5 and 10 urn. The extract-stain yielded only about half of PBAP counting, likely due to particle loss during extraction. The direct-stain method was also applied to MOUDI (multi-stage impact sampling) samplers for size-segregated measurement, showing that PBAP level peaked at 2.5 - 5.6 μm diameter. The controlling factors for PBAP episodes at Las Vegas will be discussed.
机译:目前,美国EPA正在执行国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS),以调节空气中PM2.5和PM10的年度和24小时平均浓度。 PM2.5和PM10都包含来自多个来源的多个组件。初级生物气溶胶颗粒(PBAP)是PM的重要组成部分,但关于PBAP如何促进PM2.5和PM10浓度的知识尚有限。关于与PBAP暴露有关的疾病的发生率和流行率也缺乏研究。评估PBAP浓度和与健康相关的影响的主要障碍是缺乏量化PBAP或其替代物的有效方法。荧光方法已被用于定量PM样品中含有生物气溶胶的荧光团,但是周转时间长和性能不佳限制了其应用。这项研究评估了使用落射荧光显微镜对收集在聚碳酸酯滤光片上的PM2.5和PM10中的PBAP进行定量分析的不同方案。 PBAP直接用DNA标记物在过滤器上直接染色(直接染色),或者从钳工上洗净后(提取物染色),然后进行一系列固定,显微镜成像和自动颗粒计数。首先使用参考样品验证方法,这些参考样品是通过将已知浓度的大肠杆菌或烟曲霉孢子沉积在空白的聚碳酸酯钳工上而制得的。发现直接染色法需要最少的样品制备,同时对于直径>0.3μm的PBAP,在两个数量级(r2 = 0.9)上实现了线性响应,并且当颗粒浓度> 10时,计数精度在±25%之内乘以检测极限。对于预装PM的样品保持线性关系,表明测量与环境PM相关的PBAP的可行性。在2017年春季在内华达州拉斯维加斯进行的为期两个月的监测活动中,PM10中的PBAP浓度范围为0.1至1.5#cm-3,而38%的PBAP归因于2.5至10之间的粗颗粒。提取物染色仅产生大约PBAP计数的一半,这很可能是由于提取过程中的颗粒损失所致。直接染色法还应用于MOUDI(多阶段冲击取样)采样器进行尺寸分离测量,表明PBAP水平在直径2.5-5.6μm时达到峰值。将讨论拉斯维加斯PBAP事件的控制因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号