首页> 外文会议>International Institute of Refrigeration (Institut International du Froid;IIR conference on phase-change materials and slurries for refrigeration and air conditioning >INTEGRATION OF HEAT PUMP IN COMBINED HEAT AND POWER PLANT – COMPARISON OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND ABSORPTION TECHNOLOGY
【24h】

INTEGRATION OF HEAT PUMP IN COMBINED HEAT AND POWER PLANT – COMPARISON OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND ABSORPTION TECHNOLOGY

机译:热泵在热电厂中的集成-蒸汽压缩与吸收技术的比较。

获取原文

摘要

A central combined heat and power plant based on extraction steam turbines may operate in a range of modes.The operating map is defined by boiler load and maximum (back-pressure mode) to zero (condensation mode)heat production. The paper investigates the potential of expanding the map by integrating a heat pump in thecycle of the Avedorevaerket Power Station in Copenhagen to preheat the return of district heating. The analysiswas made for both vapor compression or absorption technology by numerical simulations of the plant. In bothcases power was sacrificed to produce heat. For the vapor compression heat pump electricity from the generatorwas consumed, while for the absorption unit low pressure steam was used for the heat pump generator insteadof producing power. Both heat pumps extend the heating capacity of the plant. The vapor compression unit produced85.9 MJ s~(−1) additional heat while sacrificing 17.1 MW power. The absorption heat pump produced 74.5MJ s~(−1) heat at a COP of 1.75, while sacrificing 8.9 MW power. Hence the compression heat pump produced ahigher amount of heat, while the absorption heat pump provided a little better electric and exergy efficiency. Inaddition to the better performance of the absorption heat pump, its lower investment meant that it was estimatedto have a payback period of 8.6 years compared to 16.8 years for vapor compression unit.
机译:基于抽汽轮机的中央热电联产厂可以多种模式运行。 运行图由锅炉负载和最大(背压模式)到零(冷凝模式)定义。 发热。本文研究了通过将热泵集成到地图中来扩展地图的潜力。 哥本哈根Avedorevaerket电站的循环以预热区域供热的返回。分析 通过工厂的数值模拟为蒸汽压缩或吸收技术制得。同时 情况下,为了产生热量而牺牲了功率。对于蒸汽压缩热泵,发电机产生的电力 消耗掉了,而吸收单元则用低压蒸汽代替了热泵发生器 生产能力。两个热泵都可以扩展工厂的供热能力。产生的蒸气压缩单元 在减少17.1 MW功率的同时,增加了85.9 MJ s〜(-1)的热量。吸收式热泵产74.5 MJ s〜(-1)在COP为1.75时发热,同时牺牲8.9 MW功率。因此,压缩热泵产生了 热量更多,而吸收式热泵提供了更好的电效率和火用效率。在 除了吸收式热泵的性能更好之外,其较低的投资也意味着对它进行了估算。 投资回收期为8.6年,而蒸汽压缩装置的回收期为16.8年。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号