首页> 外文会议>Association of State Dam Safety Officials annual conference >Melding Pathways and Mechanisms for Internal Erosion Failure Modes
【24h】

Melding Pathways and Mechanisms for Internal Erosion Failure Modes

机译:内部侵蚀破坏模式的融化途径和机理

获取原文

摘要

Potential failure mode analysis (PFMA) and risk analysis procedures have evolved over the past two decades, particularly for internal erosion failure modes. Initially, internal erosion failure modes were commonly described based on typical pathways - internal erosion through the embankment, internal erosion through the foundation, internal erosion along the outlet conduit, etc. - and often the term "piping" was used interchangeably with internal erosion. More recently, industry guidance documents have tried to re-focus the understanding of internal erosion failure modes according to their processes and mechanisms - backward erosion piping, concentrated leak erosion, contact erosion, and suffusion/suffusion - with "piping" being a subset of internal erosion. Concurrently with this shift in focus to the different internal erosion mechanisms, over the past few years, the FERC and other organizations have required increasing detail in the descriptions of failure modes. This increased detail is needed to fully document the loading condition and mode of failure, from initiation to breach, to confidently categorize the failure mode for a PFMA or estimate nodal probabilities for risk analysis. It has been the authors' experience, from a workshop at the 2016 ASDSO conference and from recent PFMA sessions, that there is confusion among practitioners on how to address pathways and mechanisms in describing internal erosion failure modes. In our opinion, the description needs to include both pathway and mechanism, as the two combined will define how the failure mode initiates and progresses, what considerations should be used to judge its likelihood, and where and how signs of the failure mode may be exhibited at the dam. This paper explains the mechanisms and pathways and how they are combined to fully and accurately describe an internal erosion failure mode.
机译:在过去的二十年中,潜在的失效模式分析(PFMA)和风险分析程序得到了发展,特别是对于内部侵蚀失效模式。最初,通常基于典型的途径描述内部侵蚀破坏模式-通过路堤的内部侵蚀,通过基础的内部侵蚀,沿出口管道的内部侵蚀等-且术语“管道”通常与内部侵蚀互换使用。最近,行业指导文件试图根据其过程和机理(后向腐蚀管道,集中泄漏腐蚀,接触腐蚀和注水/注水)重新集中对内部腐蚀失效模式的理解,而“管道”是其中的一个子集。内部侵蚀。在关注焦点转移到不同的内部腐蚀机制的同时,在过去的几年中,FERC和其他组织要求在故障模式的描述中增加更多的细节。需要更多的细节来完整记录从启动到破坏的加载条件和失败模式,以可靠地对PFMA的失败模式进行分类或估计节点概率以进行风险分析。从2016年ASDSO会议的研讨会和最近的PFMA会议的经验来看,从业者在如何解决描述内部侵蚀破坏模式的途径和机制上存在困惑。我们认为,描述需要同时包括路径和机制,因为两者的结合将定义故障模式的启动和发展方式,应使用哪些考虑因素来判断其可能性,以及在何处以及如何显示故障模式的迹象。在水坝。本文解释了机理和途径,以及如何将它们结合起来以全面,准确地描述内部侵蚀破坏模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号