首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Management Science and Engineering >Study on the Causes of Social Stability Risk of Environmental Engineering Project-Based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis Method
【24h】

Study on the Causes of Social Stability Risk of Environmental Engineering Project-Based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis Method

机译:基于质量比较分析法的环境工程项目社会稳定风险成因研究

获取原文

摘要

In recent years, as China's faster economic development, environmental engineering projects due to social needs and increased risk also will be normalized. In 2014, the Blue Book of Chinese Society pointed out that in recent years, the number of social events caused by various social contradictions was more than 10,000[1]. Where the environmental mass incidents are multiple with 30% annual growth. In all kinds of environmental conflicts, environmental engineering projects conflicts are emerging. The academic community has gradually carried out the construction of major projects of social stability risk assessment criteria, evaluation index system and other attempts to standardize the implementation of the project research, and achieved more fruitful research results. Local governments have been working in practice based on the corresponding evaluation index system. It is found that the establishment of environmental engineering project evaluation criteria is very important. However the root causes of social stability risk are essential for solving the fundamental problems. In the transition period, Chinese scholars are having great concern to the causes of the conflict. The scholars believe that with the consciousness of people's environment, the awakening and strengthening of citizens' consciousness, the lack of interest demands, the deviation of risk cognition, the influence of psychological perception and so on Important reasons for the frequent conflict of environmental engineering projects. From the theory used in the analysis, there are political opportunity structure theory, collective action theory, discourse theory, relative deprivation theory[2]. Some scholars believe that the occurrence of mass incidents (collective action) is an important factor in the environmental engineering as a social engineering, embedded in the local community, did not take into account the local knowledge, local identity, the impact of factors[3]. Therefore, in order to solve the analytical bias and selectivity bias caused by empirical data and case studies, this paper analyzes the multivariate independent variables by qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) (Ragin 1987, 2000)
机译:近年来,随着中国经济的快速发展,由于社会需要和风险增加而导致的环境工程项目也将被正常化。 2014年,《中国社会蓝皮书》指出,近年来,由各种社会矛盾引起的社会事件超过10,000例。 [1] 。环境事故多发,每年以30%的速度增长。在各种环境冲突中,环境工程项目冲突正在出现。学术界逐步开展了社会稳定风险评估标准,评价指标体系等重大项目的建设,以规范项目研究的实施,取得了较为丰硕的研究成果。地方政府一直在根据相应的评估指标体系进行实践。发现建立环境工程项目评价标准非常重要。但是,社会稳定风险的根本原因对于解决根本问题至关重要。在过渡时期,中国学者非常关注冲突的成因。学者认为,随着人们环境意识的增强,公民意识的觉醒与增强,利益需求的缺失,风险认知的偏离,心理感知的影响等,是环境工程项目频频发生冲突的重要原因。 。从分析中使用的理论来看,有政治机会结构理论,集体行动理论,话语理论,相对剥夺理论[2]。一些学者认为,群体性事件的发生(集体行动)是环境工程中的一个重要因素,因为作为社会工程,嵌入当地社区,没有考虑到当地知识,当地身份,影响因素 [3] 。因此,为了解决由经验数据和案例研究引起的分析偏差和选择性偏差,本文通过定性比较分析(QCA)对多元自变量进行了分析(Ragin 1987,2000)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号