首页> 外文会议>ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping conference >SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM MECHANICAL TESTING TO EVALUATE THE EFFECT OF FLAWS IN BUTT FUSION JOINTS IN POLYETHYLENE PIPES
【24h】

SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM MECHANICAL TESTING TO EVALUATE THE EFFECT OF FLAWS IN BUTT FUSION JOINTS IN POLYETHYLENE PIPES

机译:评估聚乙烯管对接熔接中缺陷的短期和长期力学测试

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The use of non-destructive examination (NDE) for assessing the quality of butt fusion joints in polyethylene (PE) pipes has been included in the draft Mandatory Appendix ⅩⅩⅥ to Section Ⅲ of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Rules for construction of Class 3 buried polyethylene pressure piping). However, currently, there are no acceptance criteria for flaws in butt fusion joints in PE pipes. There is an ASME Task Group on flaw evaluation for PE pipe, which is developing a code case using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) to determine critical flaw sizes. However, the initial experimental crack growth data generated suggests that linear elastic fracture mechanics is not able to adequately describe slow crack growth in PE materials. In addition, this work is only considering planar lack of fusion flaws in the joint; it is not considering other critical flaw types that can occur in butt fusion joints, such as particulate contamination and cold fusion. TWI has developed procedures using mechanical testing to develop flaw acceptance criteria for butt fusion joints in PE pipes. This is based on inserting lack of fusion flaws of known size and particulate contamination flaws of known concentrations into butt fusion joints and determining the effect of these flaws on both the short-term and long-term integrity of the joints. An important aspect of this work is to determine which of the wide array of mechanical tests available for assessing the integrity of butt fusion joints in PE pipes are the most discriminating. This paper describes the procedures developed for inserting simulated flaws into butt fusion joints in PE pipes, the experimental work to compare the results from different standard short-term and long-term tests on flawed and unflawed joints and the procedures developed to determine flaw acceptance criteria. Results have shown that the most discriminating short-term test for butt fusion joints in PE pipes is a tensile test using a waisted specimen, such as those defined in EN 12814-2, EN 12814-7 and ISO 13953, and the most discriminating property is the energy to break the specimen. The most appropriate long-term test for butt fusion joints in PE pipes is the whole pipe tensile creep rupture test, as defined in EN 12814-3; this is the only long-term whole pipe test that consistently generates slow crack growth in the fused joint, even if it contains no flaws.
机译:ASME《锅炉和压力容器规范》(类别构造规则)第III节的强制性附录ⅩⅩⅥ草案中已包括使用非破坏性检查(NDE)来评估聚乙烯(PE)管对接熔接接头的质量。 3埋入聚乙烯压力管道)。但是,目前还没有关于PE管对接熔接接头缺陷的验收标准。 ASME的PE管缺陷评估工作组正在开发一个使用线性弹性断裂力学(LEFM)来确定关键缺陷尺寸的代码案例。但是,生成的初始实验裂纹扩展数据表明,线性弹性断裂力学无法充分描述PE材料中缓慢的裂纹扩展。此外,这项工作仅考虑了关节平面上缺乏融合缺陷的情况。它没有考虑对接熔接中可能出现的其他严重缺陷类型,例如微粒污染和冷熔接。 TWI已开发出使用机械测试的程序,以制定PE管道对接熔接接头的缺陷接受标准。这是基于在对接熔接接头中插入已知尺寸的熔合缺陷和已知浓度的微粒污染缺陷,并确定这些缺陷对接头的短期和长期完整性的影响。这项工作的一个重要方面是确定可用于评估PE管中对接熔接接头完整性的各种机械测试中哪一项是最有区别的。本文介绍了将模拟缺陷插入到PE管对接接头中的程序,比较了有缺陷和无瑕疵的接头的不同标准短期和长期测试结果的实验​​工作,以及确定缺陷接受标准的程序。结果表明,对PE管中对接熔接的最有区别的短期测试是使用腰部试样(例如,EN 12814-2,EN 12814-7和ISO 13953中定义的那些)进行的拉伸试验,并且具有最明显的性能是破坏标本的能量。 PE管中对接熔接的最合适的长期试验是按照EN 12814-3的规定进行全管拉伸蠕变断裂试验。这是唯一一项长期的全管测试,即使没有任何缺陷,该测试也会在熔融接头处持续产生缓慢的裂纹扩展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号